Christian Encounters: J.R.R. Tolkien by Mark Horne « beauty in the mundane (offsite)

This was a pleasurable biography well written and extensive in its scope. It is easy to read and draws parallels between emotional and historical happenings that impacted Tolkien which then shaped how he wrote and what he chose to write about. I love these peeks into an author’s life that give you the “Aha” moment of understanding.

His early loss of his father, his later loss of his mother and his relationship with Edith, his wife, are thoughtfully explored and covered. The impact of deep and rich relationships with C.S. Lewis and many other men illustrate his care and concern for others. Mr. Horne has used extensive materials in the writing of this biography and it is wonderfully written. In the appendix he lists five other resources for further study that he found very informative and enjoyable.

As a home school mom, I appreciated the fact that his own mother had home schooled him for a period of time. I think these stories are a great length for the high school student to use for essay writing and would be a good complement to any English curriculum.

Read the whole post: Christian Encounters: J.R.R. Tolkien by Mark Horne « beauty in the mundane.

Sound Off: Book Review: J.R.R. Tolkien by Mark Horne (offsite)

If you pressed me to think about it, I would probably say my all-time favorite fiction author is J.R.R. Tolkien. Last year I read a biography in the Christian Encounters series about Winston Churchill. In the last pages of the book were some “coming soon” advertisements. One was for J.R.R. Tolkien, and I was SOOO excited. I hoped I would have the chance to review it, but I didn’t hold my breath. Recently it popped up on booksneeze as an e-book. It was the opportunity I had hoped for!

Mark Horne compiled many different sources to bring a fresh, new biography about Tolkien which explores his life events and how they shaped his writings.

Tolkien is probably best known as the author of the Lord of the Rings. He wrote that book later in his life, after writing The Hobbit, yet he laid a foundation for Middle Earth many years before either book came to be. In Horne’s biography about Tolkien I discovered many things that fascinated me. Tolkien was a linguist. He was fluent in several languages and preferred to read works of literature in their original languages. (He developed his own fictional elven language.) The passion he had for linguistics shaped his career path as well. Horne avoids making many assumptions or conclusions about Tolkien. Instead, he presents factual information in a chronological format. He sometimes makes suggestions about possible correlation between the events of his life and his writings, but conclusions are left up to the reader.

Read the rest: Sound Off: Book Review: J.R.R. Tolkien by Mark Horne.

On your Mark 3: Psalm 7 and the Righteousness of God

audio

Psalm 7 – ESVBible.org

Links to my series on the Righteousness of God

Reading Psalm 7 one morning recently, I was struck by the fact that both 3 and 7 are from the story of David fleeing from Jerusalem. That strikes me as odd. There is no other story mentioned in any of the other of the first seven Psalms. Why would the Absalom crisis be the starting point in the Psalter?

I don’t know.

But I also noticed that Psalm 7 is important for the significance of the term “the righteousness of God” as found in several places in the Bible, not least in Paul’s letter to the Romans.

Psalm 7 ends with thanksgiving:

I will give to YHWH the thanks due to his righteousness,
and I will sing praise to the name of the YHWH, the Most High.

So why is thanks due to God’s righteousness? Because he has imputed it to us? No, that is not what the Psalm says. Verses 9 and 11 spells out the good news about God’s righteous character:

Oh, let the evil of the wicked come to an end,
and may you establish the righteous—
you who test the minds and hearts,
O righteous God!…
God is a righteous judge,
and a God who feels indignation every day.

As I’ve written many times and taught my whole life, God does give us a righteous status in Christ. In Philippians 3.9, we see this using three words: “righteousness from God.” However, in most cases in the NT, when you read the term “the righteousness of God,” you are dealing with a very different term that is only two words: God’s righteousness.

When we trust God to save or rescue and even to forgive us according to his promises then we are depending on his righteous character. Paul says over and over again in Romans that the Gospel–the story of the death and resurrection of Jesus as promised by the prophets–publicly demonstrates God’s righteousness. While I’ve shown in my post series on how this is found all over the Psalms and Isaiah, as well as in Paul’s and John’s letters, we see a very direct and compact example of this in Psalm 7. God saves us because he is righteous and we thank him for being righteous.

This was why N. T. Wright’s book, What Saint Paul Really Said, was so helpful to me. By pursuing this line of interpretation Romans suddenly made so much more sense.

But of course there are many others besides N. T. Wright. Let me end this post with a quotation from Sinclair Ferguson

Elijah had come to God and said, “Lord, You promised. I believe this is Your word. It must be so. Let it be so in answer to my prayers.” Daniel’s praying was of the same order as his appeal to the “righteousness” of God eloquently testifies (vv. 7, 16). The Old Testament term “righteousness” has a specifically covenantal orientation. The young Martin Luther could not see this when he struggled to understand what Paul meant by “the righteousness of God” (Rom. 1:17). Of course, Luther was not helped by the fact that his Latin Bible translated Paul’s Greek word dikaiosune (righteousness) as justitia (justice). Luther’s mistake has sometimes been repeated by evangelical Christians. Often righteousness has been thought of merely as the equivalent of the just punishment of God. Preachers therefore may often accompany the use of the phrase “the righteousness of God” with the gesticulation of a clenched fist. It is clear even from this passage, however, that this is to reduce the full biblical meaning of God’s righteousness. Daniel sees the righteousness of God both as the basis for God’s judgment of the people (v. 7) and also as the basis for his own prayer for forgiveness (v. 16). How can this be? In Scripture, “righteousness” basically means “integrity.” Sometimes it is defined as “conformity to a norm.” In the case of God, the norm to which He conforms is His own being and character. He is true to Himself, He always acts in character. God has expressed the norm of His relationship to His people by means of a covenant. He will always be true and faithful to His covenant and the promises enshrined in it. Plainly, God’s righteousness is His faithfulness to His covenant relationship –Sinclair Ferguson, Daniel (Waco, TX: Word Books, 1988).

On the Mark podcast 2: The Secret Life of Bill Clinton by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Brief review of The Secret Life of Bill Clinton

audio

links:

I blanked about the Telegraph as the paper Ambrose Evans-Pritchard works for when I recorded the pod cast. Here are his current stories.

OKC bombing

First go here, and scroll down to March 27, 2004 and download the audio. (I don’t want other people’s audio to post as part of my own podcast).

July 22, 2005 – J.D. Cash | ScottHortonShow.

November 26, 2005 – J.D. Cash | ScottHortonShow.

January 20, 2006 – J.D. Cash | ScottHortonShow.

March 4, 2006 – J.D. Cash | ScottHortonShow.

July 24, 2009 – Roger Charles | ScottHortonShow.

March 31, 2010 – Jesse Trentadue | ScottHortonShow.

April 14, 2010 – Roger Charles | ScottHortonShow.

August 4, 2010 – James Ridgeway | ScottHortonShow.

December 17, 2008 – Roger Charles | ScottHortonShow.

March 31, 2010 Jesse Trentadue | ScottHortonShow.

May 1, 2010 – David Paul Hammer | ScottHortonShow.

October 10, 2010 – Roger Charles | ScottHortonShow.

October 26, 2010 – Roger Charles | ScottHortonShow.

April 21, 2011 – Jesse Trentadue | ScottHortonShow.

Brig Gen Ben Partin Lecture; Oklahoma City / Part 1 of 2 – YouTube.

Brig Gen Ben Partin Lecture; Oklahoma City / Part 2 of 2 – YouTube.

Vince Foster

Here is an article defending Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

Mena, Arkansas CIA, Contra, Cocaine

Read the prologue of this book (available online).

 

 

Gary North v. Dave Ramsey, a few unscripted thoughts for a first “On your Mark” podcast

audio

Gary North’s article

One of Mish’s more recent posts (one of many) questioning inflation and showing evidence for deflation

I mentioned Eloi and Morlocks without much explanation.

And here is the Peter Schiff appearance on Kudlow and Co. that made me think of the analogy with the H. G. Wells scenario. Of course, Schiff’s opponents were accounting for factors that Schiff seems to have underestimated (how will foreign markets do when America’s economy crashes). But Schiff saw what was coming and analyzed the con job that America’s government/banker combine has pulled on the rest of the world via a fiat reserve currency.

One minor explanation on many things that I may not have spelled out well enough: “the boy who cried wolf” is not a direct reference to Schiff or North or any other one person, but to the “economy is about to crash” publishing/newsletter industry as a whole. As far as I know, Schiff’s wolf-detector has never been premature.

(Never mind) Gary North v Dave Ramsey v. my first awnurmarc podcast (totally unscripted)

OK, this was the wrong audio file and didn’t download. So I’ll try again. I’m looking for a free site that will let me upload mp3 files and directly link them.

Gary North’s article

One of Mish’s more recent posts (one of many) questioning inflation and showing evidence for deflation

I mentioned Eloi and Morlocks without much explanation

Review: A Country of Vast Designs

A Country of Vast Designs
A Country of Vast Designs by Robert Merry
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

I started this book assuming I would find confirmation of my dislike of James Polk for “getting us into” war with Mexico. It had the opposite effect. While I differ with Polk on what would have been a vision for the American people, and the reasons one should go to war, it is pretty obvious that Polk was in office precisely because the American people wanted that vision. Polk’s faults seem to lie in the faults of the American people of the time.

Polk promised to serve only one term and he kept his promise willingly. He accomplished all his objectives (amazingly) and got very little to no appreciation for doing so. And he got to see how his vision was going to be pulled apart by the slavery/anti-slavery divide.

He ended well. His term in office seems to have killed him and he died very soon after leaving office. But Polk did have time to decide to follow Christ, get baptized, and “die in the Lord.” Look forward to meeting him.

By the way, if you have some vision of America once being led by “statemen” instead of politicians, that vision will die in this book.

View all my reviews