Author Archives: mark

Proto-incarnationalism: Theophany

The Holy Spirit came down in the form of the dove on Jesus when he was baptized.

I don’t believe that the Holy Spirit actually joined to the nature of a dove, so if an observer pointed and said, “Look, a dove!” he would have been mistaken.

Nevertheless, if he had pointed and said, “Look, the Spirit,” he would have been correct.

Of course, “The Angel of the Lord” appears all over the place in the Bible, especially in the book of Judges. Before kings were put in office, Israel seems more or less like a Narnia with Aslan appearing and disappearing to deal with various problems in the nation. But Hagar and Abraham and Jacob also meet with a figure who seems to look human and then is revealed to be God. Thus, in Genesis 18, Abraham meets God and two angels as human beings in appearance.

My point here is that the incarnation, while new, is not that surprising. God showed the ability to unite Himself with creaturely traits (such as location in space) from the very beginning.

In fact, when we are told that God breathed into Adam’s nostrils, the easiest way to understand in passage in context is that God appeared as a man like Adam giving him mouth to nose suscitation.

Rivers of life

And he cried to the LORD, and the LORD showed him a log, and he threw it into the water, and the water became sweet.
There the LORD made for them a statute and a rule, and there he tested them, saying, “If you will diligently listen to the voice of the LORD your God, and do that which is right in his eyes, and give ear to his commandments and keep all his statutes, I will put none of the diseases on you that I put on the Egyptians, for I am the LORD, your healer.”

Then they came to Elim, where there were twelve springs of water and seventy palm trees, and they encamped there by the water (Exodus 15:25-27 ESV).

So 1) someone counted all the springs and trees, 2) recorded the numbers, and 3) preserved this record under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

And 4) repeated it a second time:

And they set out from Marah and came to Elim; at Elim there were twelve springs of water and seventy palm trees, and they camped there (Numbers 33:9 ESV).

Who cares about the numbers? Or even the presence of springs and trees? Why not just say they camped at an oasis?

But the context of the whole Bible indicates this really shouldn’t surprise us. Genesis 2 begins creation with trees by rivers of water. And the last book of the Bible ends that way:

Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, bright as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb through the middle of the street of the city; also, on either side of the river, the tree of life with its twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit each month. The leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations (Revelation 22:1-2 ESV).

Within this overarching pattern, we have a story of seventy nations (Genesis 10) and the twelve tribes of Israel appointed as a kingdom of priests to them.

Twelve springs of water feeding seventy palm trees. In God’s providence the oasis was a message about Israel’s calling.

And in the immediate context of the promise about diseases, it clarifies the situation. God promises that none of Egypt’s diseases will fall on them but then, lest they think they are called to be healthy in a sick world, makes it clear that they are to be a source of healing water. The river feeds the trees to heal the nations.

Does God Love the Sinner and Hate the Sin?

The short answer: yes.

I used to think this cliche was naive. After all, sins aren’t punished; sinners are.

On Judgment Day, we won’t see any love expressed toward unbelievers, only the penalty of their sins, which will all be left unforgiven.

This is true. And the expression “Love the sinner; hate the sin” should never be used to pretend otherwise.

But that is not the point.

God has established that, right now, before the Final Judgment, it is right and true to love the sinner and hate the sin.

To understand this, consider Genesis 1-3.

God promised immediate death for the eating of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil. Adam and Eve were supposed to die the same day that they trespassed on God’s food.

But they didn’t die. Adam and Eve were exiled, and animals died to give them covering. But they were alive.

Because of God’s mercy, there was now a period of time in which Adam and Eve could repent and be saved. It was now possible to separate their selves from their sins.

In fact, the whole point was that they needed to love themselves truly by hating their sins.

And every time we present an unbeliever with the Gospel, we are revealing that they have a moment in history to take advantage of this temporary separation. Every unbeliever, when he hears the Gospel, should repent and trust in Jesus. He should love himself by hating his sin and trusting God to deliver him from it through Christ Jesus.

The horrible fact is that many chose to love their sin and hate themselves. If they continue in this, it will eventually be too late. Sins and selves will be forever one.

Unhappily, some Christians, believing in God’s complete fore-ordination of all things (correctly), infer from this truth that God’s future attitude toward unbelievers on Judgment Day is identical to his present and past attitude.

But this is simply a false inference. Just because God has decreed that something will happen doesn’t mean he views it as having already happened, or that every moment leading up to that eventual future is of no significance. As Paul writes in Romans 2.

 We know that the judgment of God rightly falls on those who practice such things. Do you suppose, O man—you who judge those who practice such things and yet do them yourself—that you will escape the judgment of God? Or do you presume on the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience, not knowing that God’s kindness is meant to lead you to repentance? But because of your hard and impenitent heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath when God’s righteous judgment will be revealed (Romans 2:2-5 ESV).

The fact that wrath is building up does not change the fact that this is a time of God’s kindness and patience. In fact, it is precisely because God’s kindness of making a time of grace–when sins and sinners can be separated–that rejecting this opportunity is such a wicked act of ingratitude.

It would be totally wrong to use the fact of a Future Judgment to deny God’s present kindness and patience.

Love the sinner and hate the sin as long as there is still time!

When private ownership is not private ownership

Hoping to be nominated federal judge, Burton starts passing on major clients to Nick. The CEO they start with makes merger negotiations excruciating because of his selfish hidden agenda concerning a company jet. Jake proves his social skills can be valuable.

via The Guardian (2001) – Episodes – IMDb.

I’m watching this on Netflix during down time. It is a pretty interesting show. Much of it is typical melodrama, but sometimes you get insight from it.

This episode was one of those times. Nick is supposed to arrange the acquisition of a specific company for the CEO of another company. The amount the CEO is willing for his company to pay is challenging, but Nick brings it off by getting the target company to agree to sell off non-essential assets. His client is livid about this.

Nick is clueless but finds out from his boss/father what is going on. The entire real motive for acquiring the company was to acquire the company jet.

“If he wants the jet, why doesn’t he just buy it?”

“Son, he is a CEO! He’s not rich. He can’t afford it.”

So perhaps you never realized that CEO’s are poor, but they seem to be aware of it.

Private property and free trade works because it is in people’s best interests to serve the interests of others. I find it hard to understand how our current arrangement of “publicly owned” and traded companies can possibly count as private property. If you have thousands of shares, how much is the owner of some of those shares really an owner?

What we have are a series of institutions that are “owned” piecemeal by a group of people with no long term state in the value of these entities. As long as they jump ship in time and move to another stock, they are fine. And then they are run by people with no long term interest in the future of these entities.

This is not a formula for long term prosperity; and it is arguably not a system of private property.

Suffering evil trains you to discern between good and evil

In Hebrews 5.14, we read: “But solid food is for the mature, for those who have their powers of discernment trained by constant practice to distinguish good from evil.”

Discernment sounds like a valuable ability. So what does it take? How does one get trained?

We are given the answer throughout the book, but the most close connection is made in Hebrews 12.11, which is the only other place in the book that word is used:

It is for discipline that you have to endure. God is treating you as sons. For what son is there whom his father does not discipline? If you are left without discipline, in which all have participated, then you are illegitimate children and not sons. Besides this, we have had earthly fathers who disciplined us and we respected them. Shall we not much more be subject to the Father of spirits and live? For they disciplined us for a short time as it seemed best to them, but he disciplines us for our good, that we may share his holiness. For the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant, but later it yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it (Hebrews 12:7-11 ESV).

Hebrews tells us Jesus “learned obedience through what he suffered.” It seems he learned discernment as well.

Spiritual warfare; the basic texts

“If you hear in one of your cities, which the LORD your God is giving you to dwell there, that certain worthless fellows have gone out among you and have drawn away the inhabitants of their city, saying, ‘Let us go and serve other gods,’ which you have not known, then you shall inquire and make search and ask diligently. And behold, if it be true and certain that such an abomination has been done among you, you shall surely put the inhabitants of that city to the sword, devoting it to destruction, all who are in it and its cattle, with the edge of the sword. You shall gather all its spoil into the midst of its open square and burn the city and all its spoil with fire, as a whole burnt offering to the LORD your God. It shall be a heap forever. It shall not be built again. None of the devoted things shall stick to your hand, that the LORD may turn from the fierceness of his anger and show you mercy and have compassion on you and multiply you, as he swore to your fathers, if you obey the voice of the LORD your God, keeping all his commandments that I am commanding you today, and doing what is right in the sight of the LORD your God (Deuteronomy 13:12-18 ESV).

Whole burnt offerings require fire that God himself lit. God’s presence lit the fire on the altar in the Tabernacle. When Aaron’s two oldest sons tried to add new fire, God consumed them (Lev 10). So the most obvious meaning of this passage is that fire from the altar is used to burn the city.

The reference to not allowing anything from the city to stick to one’s hand, and then the city being a heap forever, reminds us of what happened not too long after Moses gave these instructions. Achan took gold and silver and a garment from Jericho. He let it stick to his hand. “And they raised over him a great heap of stones that remains to this day” (Joshua 7:26a ESV).

Jericho was put to the sword and then burned as a Canaanite city.  This puts Moses’ instructions in perspective. He is telling them that, once they have eradicated paganism and are living in the land, if a city becomes pagan, it should meet the same fate as the pagan cities. Cities like Jericho were the first ones burnt with fire from the altar.

But consider the details: Before Jericho is conquered, two witnesses go to the city and single out a household to save, protecting them within the doors of a house.

This had happened before. Centuries earlier two angels went to Sodom and saved Lot’s household before devoting the city to destruction by fire from heaven.

So what once was done by angels is now done by people.

And just as Jericho was destroyed by a worship processional, so now our prayers wage war:

And another angel came and stood at the altar with a golden censer, and he was given much incense to offer with the prayers of all the saints on the golden altar before the throne, and the smoke of the incense, with the prayers of the saints, rose before God from the hand of the angel. Then the angel took the censer and filled it with fire from the altar and threw it on the earth, and there were peals of thunder, rumblings, flashes of lightning, and an earthquake (Revelation 8:3-5 ESV).

 

When babies have authority

If you put together everything that Paul says about the characteristics of children and the need to grow up, I think we can glean the following:

  • Children need to be under authority, rather than be given authority.
  • Children who are given freedom/authority are prone to be exploited by bad teachers and leaders.
  • Children who want to stay that way have a tendency to resent and persecute those who are growing up.
  • Adults should grow up but there is a temptation to attempt to remain a child; and many succumb to it.
  • Remaining a child is really not an option; one can only choose between growing up and becoming warped beyond human recognition.

This last is in our fairy tales. Think Pinocchio’s choice to either become a real son or else turn into a donkey.

One might profitably meditate what might happen to an institution–whether a business, a nation, a world order, or a denomination in the Church–that came under the control of people who did not grow up.

Understanding Economic Justice and Logic


Justice

You hire ten people for $10/hour. This means, the average wage is now $10/hour among your employees.

This seems too low to a some people who gain political control. So they make a law that forbids you from hiring anyone for less than $12.50/hour. You do the math and realize that you can probably make do with only eight employees if you are forced to do so, but you simply can’t afford to lose the extra, $25/hour.

So you fire two of your employees. This means that the average pay of your workers is now 25% higher than before. This is trumpeted in the news as a major government success story. When the rise in unemployment is reported, it is presented as a new problem to be solved by a comptent government, not the results of unjust government tyranny.

Injustice

You pay ten employees $10/hour but realize they don’t have time to do all the work. You think about hiring one more person, but then realize that the time is mostly consumed in tasks that don’t require skilled labor. So instead of hiring one person you higher two students who still live at home and didn’t graduate from High School for $5/hour (pretend we don’t have a minimum wage law that makes it illegal to hire people at that rate, forcing them to remain unemployed).

This means you are a harsh and unjust business. You are now paying 12 employees collectively $110/hour. That means the average pay per hour has gone from $10/hour to less than $9.17/hour. This fact is reported in the news media as if you have lowered the pay of all of your employees.

You are evil and are going to go to hell.

(In the meantime, with our present minimum wage laws, those non-graduates never get a job and never learn skills and opportunities that come from being employed. They are stuck at the bottom of the ladder with all the rungs they could reach kicked out from above them.)

Four reasons to memorize Proverbs

Credentials to speak on the subject:

Until recently, I worked as a truck driver. Not really. I was a sanitation engineer. Not really. I was a portapottie guy.

But it involved driving a truck at about forty minutes at a time. And it had a CD player.

Using CD burning tech on my computer, I went into the truck with Proverbs 10, then 11, and 12. I memorized all three chapters so I could say it all in order from start to finish.

I haven’t retained a lot of it. I need to get it loaded on an iPod and spend some time practicing, again, or else start getting disciplined about flash cards or something. If you don’t use it you lose it.

But for awhile I had it and did use it, and these are some of the things I can say from that experience.

1. Proverbs is God’s Catechism; it is meant to be memorized

OK, This is more the reason I began memorizing Proverbs than something I learned… except I can say I am more convinced that Proverbs was meant for this now, than when I started.

Think of the things that we consider to be ideal catechisms for the Church. I don’t doubt that teaching Christian doctrine, and even giving exact words for Christians to use, is a good idea. But we have to admit that God could have had Paul or someone write such a thing. Instead he had Solomon and others give us Proverbs.

2. God tells us to teach our children “when you are going out.”

So here’s the thing. I can’t grab a pocket Bible, or my Kindle, and look up a verse while I am driving. But I have a captive audience and memorizing Proverbs gave me a chance to exploit the situation.

Many times I hid what I was doing. I’d throw one of the kids a Bible and say, “Can you see how I’m doing?” and let them read and make sure I was reciting everything word-perfect…. and often that worked. (Note: in my experience, the younger you start this, the more productive it will be.)

But if you want a chance to discuss with your teen sons the basic alternative between plunder and production, and the habits that are demanded by making the right choice, Solomon will provide plenty of help.

In any case, my 8-year-old got credit for her school’s public speaking competition for reciting Proverbs 10.1-8. (She would have done more, except for the time limit.) One other advantage about memorizing the Proverbs is that, not only can you repeat them to your children, and talk about them, but you can also be their means of memorizing them for themselves.

3. The only way to map some mazes is to meander through them.

There are many books in the Bible in which a scholar is able to know the general story and look at the text on the page and pick out details that help him make an outline or see and order that wasn’t obvious at first.

In most respects, Proverbs is not one of those books. It seems jumbled, too repetitive, and at times given to insultingly-obvious tautologies. You have a hard time convincing yourself that someone was grabbing from a pile of notes and writing sayings down randomly.

But when you start to actually memorize, the “shape” of Proverbs seems a lot more coherent. I would never have seen this chiasm if I hadn’t been memorizing, to name a small example.

(In fact, the majority of what I wrote in this category comes from the time I was memorizing Proverbs.)

I’m not sure how to demonstrate or explain what I want to say here, so I’ll resort to an analogy. Most times you get directions you don’t have to keep track of that much. You learn to look for a couple of intersections and which way you should turn; that is all you need.

Proverbs is more like a thick forest. There doesn’t seem to be any trail through it. But once you actually start exploring, you begin to pick out landmarks. It becomes familiar. Even though you couldn’t give directions or draw a map that would work with a novice, you find you could easily lead them through it.

One way this pays off is with reading the portions of Proverbs I had not yet memorized. It became easier to comprehend. I wasn’t haunted by the vague sense that I had read that same sentence somewhere else in the book; I knew exactly where I had run into it. The entire book began to seem more familiar even though I had only “taken possession” of three chapters.

4. Your “New Testament” will suddenly double in size.

The Gospels and Letters to the Church after Christ are filled with appeals/allusions to the Proverbs. It is amazing. Without Proverbs I’m not sure what ethics would be left. You feel like every single book in the “New Testament” doubles as a commentary on Solomon.