Category Archives: political-economy

10 Reasons You Should Get a Job

Let me start this by saying that Steve Palina has a lot of worthwhile things to say. Just because I think his 10 Reasons You Should Never Get a Job is pretty flawed does not mean that I disagree with everything else and don’t find other great things on his site to read. I do. Just not his 10 Reasons You Should Never Get a Job.

1. Income for What You’re Best At

First of all, people have different gifts and abilities, as well as resources. It doesn’t follow that the people whose best assets are their own labor for others are stupid or dumb. A brain surgeon, for example, is going to need someone to provide resources such as medical equipment. It is no reflection on his intelligence if he works for a hospital.

Palina’s recommendation of building an income-producing system is only smart if your resulting income is superior to what you will make by “trading time for money.” (this isn’t simply a matter of which brings in more revenue; maybe you would rather make less and work less).

Of course, if you’ve never thought about finding a way to generate revenue without having to “trade time for money,” then reading Palina’s essay might be the best thing that ever happened to you. But that won’t be everyone and it has nothing to do with your intelligence.

The fact is that not everyone can get income in this way. The economy thrives on diversity. There will always be people who work for a living and they aren’t dumb because they do so.

Finally, with a salaried position, you are not simply paid for when you work. Most business owners will tell you that sometimes things are slow and other times they are not. Yet they pay their employees regardless unless business slows down to the point where they are forced to lay people off. What you are paid for is not purely your work. You are paid, essentially, to be on retainer because someone appreciates what you can do for him.

2. Gaining Experience

There are plenty of ways to gain experience, but to be paid while you do so is not a bad way to do it. There have been jobs for which the demand has suddenly ceased, leaving people unequipped to find a comparable income in the marketplace. But, while this has happend, it is also common to find people who have found their jobs lead them in directions they would have never have gone otherwise, providing them with a new way of making of living. A man gets a job doing website design for a company ends up in project management with a much better income (and eventually has the connections and skills to go into business for himself).

Of course, a great deal of the experience really consists in meeting other people, both customers and suppliers and bringing them together. And, besides experience, there is a reputation to build up so that, when the time is right, you might get to move on up into self employment or investing in some asset that generates revenue.

On the other hand, your growth in experience and relationships may make you become a great asset at your job so that you don’t need to do anything else. Maybe not. But you never know and there is no reason to burn bridges unless you are sure it is in your best interests.

3. Domestication

Learning to work with others is a basic human skill, including others who you do not like and who have too much authority. You can try to live life like these situations are completely avoidable. For those who choose such a life, ninety-nine percent of the time they will become worse than the problems they want to avoid. How many victorious rebellions end up creating situations that are worse than the ones they overthrew?

Lets assume Steve’s pejorative description is accurate: jobs are domesticating. Even so, systems of domestication are not always evil for all people at all stages of their lives. Overbearing mothers who try to keep their children from growing up are not an argument against all mothers and all families. The fact that people (maybe many people who will be helped by Steve’s article) will be more hindered than helped by a job, does not mean that “domestication” is always a bad thing.

4. Buying Power

The reason why Walmart can sell at low prices is because they can buy in high quantities and get products sold to them for less. Then they pass on the savings.

Likewise, companies can provide things for you that would be much harder to get if you were to try to go into business with no starting capital of your own. Investors and owners provide equipment you would have to acquire somehow. Other members of the team find customers who want the work you do. Teams can often do more together than any one member could do by himself. This is not always true. People discover they can work more productively on their own at some point. More power to them. But claiming that a company represents “too many mouths” to feed, simply isn’t true in all cases.

5. Reducing Risk

When someone has something of value to offer, the main challenge is spreading the news–finding the people who need the value offered so that they know who to go to. Getting a job means you don’t have to do all that marketing yourself. You just need to reach one person who already has a network.

There is a trade-off of risk here. But usually, if you do a half-decent job and learn some basic social skills, keeping your job is easy. And, you can always save and invest so that you can soften the blow if you are fired.

6. Living In the Herd

One of the basic values one needs to have to be a successful independent business man is to not burn bridges when one is involved in a disagreement. You never know when the person annoying you will be in a position to provide you with something you need. No matter how idiotic a person is being, it is best to extricate yourself in a way that does not leave anyone unnecessarily offended.

Likewise, just because the word “boss” derives from “master” and “bovine”–I’ll not challenge the veracity of the linguistic connection since I have done no research on the subject. But if you can only think of your boss–simply because he is your boss–as an evil bovine master, then I doubt you will be any good as either an employee or an independent business man.

7. Money is given to you by other people; you don’t give it to yourself

The reason why people more often ask their bosses for raises rather than investing in their own income-producing business is because the former is usually much easier than the latter. Not many people go into their own business or live on investments and there is a reason for that: it is much more likely to fail.

I think it is great if you want to go for it, but don’t pretend that earning whatever you want is some sort of easy accomplishment that everyone else would achieve if Only They Weren’t So Stupid.

8. Your Social Life is what you want.

People hang out with people they like and usually who are like them. Sad but true. That is the same whether you are an employee or not.

9. Freedom is making cost/benefits decisions

Corporate rules and regulations can be insane, but usually they are caused by the litigious and over-regulated government-mandated environment that effects all of us whether we have jobs or not. Should you put up with it? Not if you don’t want to. But don’t make that decision on the pretense that you can go to a realm where your behavior is not ever going to be irrationally constrained. It will be as long as you deal with other people. And you will have to deal with other people in order to get money.

10. Fantasizing is not courage

If you are the kind of person who completely conforms to what everyone around you is doing, then you are not going to be a great entrepreneur nor are you going to really excel in your workplace. Either way you need to stand out (especially in possessing the wisdom to know how to stand out).

Blaming all your attitude problems on having a job is a step in the wrong direction. You may indeed be the sort of person who needs to leave, but you won’t do any good on your own if you can’t show greater maturity toward your supervisors and co-workers than to blame them for your own thinking.

Quit Your Job?

Then go for it. But be wise. Do it at the right time and have a plan. If you can find a way to produce passive income then more power to you.

But there is no shame in holding down a job. And it may produce more for you than what you could produce any other way. Why claim otherwise?

Limited Government and Foreign Nation-building

Tune into the next Republican presidential debate, and you will hear the usual rhetoric about limited government, lower taxes and less spending. The same candidates will then propose to expand the military, escalate the Iraq War, and possibly bomb Iran. Finally, they will resolutely defend the decision to invade Iraq.

This raises the question: What do candidates who promote an expansive, expensive, and aggressive foreign policy mean by limited government? Are conservatives (or libertarians) who push for a militantly interventionist foreign policy really conservatives (or libertarians)?

The Bush Administration might not be a particularly good representative of this policy conundrum, since it has greatly increased domestic spending, expanded the welfare state and extended the federal government’s reach. For this administration, philosophy poses no barrier to an activist foreign policy.

Inside Track: War vs. Limited Government, by Doug Bandow: READ THE REST

Small is stylish

Ever since coming back to Macs, I’ve started caring about what computers look like as well as what they can do (Those who know me will recognize this as my “Apple made me shallow” complaint).  I don’t think Mac are the only ones with this sort of appeal.  While posing it with the wine flute seems like overkill, this Sony Vaio is a thing of beauty.

Hopefully, as beauty becomes more and more a sought-after commodity, functionality will become a cheap baseline that more and more of us can afford.  I’ll be content to get my aesthetic fix from the Engadget galleries using anything that works well.

Democracy is easier if the minorities can be terrorized and driven off

Although the violence appears to be more anarchic than concerted, it has had the same effect as an organized campaign to destroy Iraq’s Assyrians. Virtually every member of the community is under siege….

Christian women are particularly vulnerable. BetBasoo writes: “Often incidents do not end with the prisoner’s release. In one case in Baghdad, the victim committed suicide after the ransom was paid and she went home, because of the torture and sexual violence she suffered. In another case, a young woman talked to her family by phone and told them: ‘I’m dead,’ referring to being gang-raped. She eventually committed suicide whilst still in the hands of her tormentors.”

Read the whole thing.

Ron Paul on G4

I don’t think we get G4 any more and this posting does not constitute an admission that I occasionally watch it about games whose platforms I cannot afford…

[kml_flashembed movie="http://youtube.com/v/1RJzZjdVCNs" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

[kml_flashembed movie="http://youtube.com/v/2jqYINOOmSg" width="425" height="350" wmode="transparent" /]

I realize we probably all need to get used to saying “Madam President,” but at least we have one Republican who is not going to bore us in the race.

I’m still hoping that Fred Thompson will run, win, and be a good president, but I’m not sure of any of those. On the other hand, with Hillary in charge, I can at least look forward to Evangelicals sounding like conservative anti-statists again.

Tell me this is just GOP fundraising

Please remember the usual caveats that, if you think something I say is boneheaded, and your looking forward to voting for her, you’re still welcom to visit my church and I won’t bite or anything….

Becaue it can’t be true, can it?

Three things you can take to the bank (or your bookie) next year: the Arizona Cardinals won’t be playing in the Superbowl, Mardi Gras will be on a Tuesday, and Hillary Rodham Clinton will become the Democrat’s presidential nominee (read the rest).

Oh well. I guess it guarrantees more to talk about in the next year.

Since I never say anything controversial here…

…well, first the usual caveats.  You don’t have to agree with me.  I don’t necesarily preach this from the pulpit.  I want to be friends with everyone and lead Bible studies and teach outside of the tiny group of right-wing nuts who are just like me.  This is just an opinion, somewhat tentative and yet somewhat strong….

Don’t hurt me.

Please.

But I really think illegal immigration is a good thing.

First  of all, we have a bunch of jobs that satisfied or lazy Americans won’t do for the market price.  Thank God for migrant farm workers.  They make money and we get to eat.

Oh, they don’t make enough.  No they don’t.  But putting them on a welfare reservation isn’t going to help.  And preventing them from coming over here is not going to put food in their mouths.

Also, thanks to illegal immigration, we might become a genuinely bilingual country.  That has got to mean our children are going to develop about ten more IQ points than otherwise.  Look, you’ve heard the joke:

What to you call someone who speaks two languages?  Bilingual.

What to you call someone who speaks three languages?  Trilingual.

What about someone who speaks one language? Monolingual.

Nope.  You call him an American.

Well, that might finally cease to be the case.  I think there are great things about American exceptionalism, but in this case it would be better if we were more like Europeans and virtually everyone else in the world.

Also, people are the source of all wealth.  Declining population is a recipe for economic disaster.  Illegal immigration isn’t the best solution to what abortion-on-demand has left us with, but it still helps.  We need to keep growing.

People talk about immigration laws as if they were holy and sancrosanct.  OK, we should all obey our authorities.  But does that mean we can’t point to lawbreaking as a sign that a law is stupid?  Do we really condemn the people who didn’t abide by prohibition as much as we condemn people who break laws against stealing, counterfeiting, or violating other government monopolies?

What about fleeing from communist countries.  I remember some movie about how people made a balloon to escape from East Germany?  This was utterly illegal.  But they did it because they wanted economic freedom and prosperity.  Americans typically called these people heroes?  So why are immigrants to our country not heroes?  They are doing exactly the same thing.

And in what sense is a Mexican looking for a better life bound by the laws of the US?  The whole situation looks gray to me.

So what does the Bible say?  I’m not going to insult anyone’s intelligence by pointing out all the many times we are commanded to welcome immigrants.  I’ll just take this one: ““If your brother becomes poor and cannot maintain himself with you, you shall support him as though he were a stranger and a sojourner, and he shall live with you” (Leviticus 25.35).  So there you go.  When your own countrymen are destitute you are to treat him as well as you would a foreigner who is destitute.  The passage assume that the Israelites are going to actually support the immigrants.

Oh, but those weren’t illegal immigrants.

Right, the Bible would consider laws against immgration to be illegal.

Oh, but they are so rude and obnoxious. Oh puh-leeze.  Like we don’t see that all the time among native-borns.  Crime increases because we don’t deal with it like we should.  We won’t punish criminals so we invent controlled-substance laws to do away with the alleged cause of criminal behavior.  The police can’t enforce noise ordinances and public lewdness statutes so we decide we need a massive police state and reams of barbed wire so you don’t have to be upset by rude behavior.  Truly, conservatives are always two steps behind liberals.  If you don’t like barbaric behavior than find ways to deal with it for both natives and aliens.  Or, perhaps, consider becoming tolerant of other people.

What about all our welfare benefits?  I’d be happy if immigrants were not granted access to those.  I’d be even happier if natives were also not granted access to those.  But if illegal immigration means government services are going to become impossible sooner than otherwise, that would be a real bonus, as far as I’m concerned.

The bottom line is that people should be free to seek their fortunes without a police state getting in the way.  They are not enemies for wanting to work here.  And if they want welfare benefits, well, we are the ones who were stupid enough to offer them.

This doesn’t mean, by the way, I think border guards should be consigned to torture for doing their jobs so Bush can look good to “liberals.”

That’s how I feel about all this, for what it is worth.

Just have to hurt people for no reason at all….

Recent news:

“I just curiously asked him, ‘Where are you getting the Internet connection?’, you know,” Sparta Police Chief Andrew Milanowski said. “And he said, ‘From the café.'”

Milanowski ruled out Peterson as a possible stalker of the attractive local hairdresser, but still felt that a law might have been broken.

“We came back and we looked up the laws and we figured if we found one and thought, ‘Well, let’s run it by the prosecutor’s office and see what they want to do,'” Milanowski said.

A few weeks later Peterson said he received a letter from the Kent County prosecutor’s office saying that he faced a felony charge of fraudulent access to computer networks and that a request had been made for an arrest warrant.

The law, introduced in 1979 to protect Internet and private-network users from hackers, and amended in 2000 to include wireless systems, makes piggybacking off of Wi-Fi networks, even those without a password, illegal.

“It wasn’t anything we were looking for, and it wasn’t anything that we frankly particularly wanted to get involved in, but it basically fell in our lap and it was a little hard to just look the other way when somebody handed it to us,” said Lynn Hopkins, assistant prosecuting attorney for Kent County.

Albert Jay Nock’s “Anarchist’s Progress”:

Once, I remember, I ran across the case of a boy who had been sentenced to prison, a poor, scared little brat, who had intended something no worse than mischief, and it turned out to be a crime. The judge said he disliked to sentence the lad; it seemed the wrong thing to do; but the law left him no option. I was struck by this. The judge, then, was doing something as an official that he would not dream of doing as a man; and he could do it without any sense of responsibility, or discomfort, simply because he was acting as an official and not as a man. On this principle of action, it seemed to me that one could commit almost any kind of crime without getting into trouble with one’s conscience.