Category Archives: culture & value

The pitiful thing is that Uncle Sam gives away a lot more

By The Denver Post

Moscow – A Russian region of Ulyanovsk has found a novel way to fight the nation’s birth-rate crisis: It has declared Sept. 12 the Day of Conception and for the third year running is giving couples time off from work to procreate.

The hope is for a brood of babies exactly nine months later on Russia’s national day. Couples who “give birth to a patriot” during the June 12 festivities win money, cars, refrigerators and other prizes.

Ulyanovsk, about 550 miles east of Moscow, has held similar contests since 2005. Since then, the number of competitors, and the number of babies born to them, has been on the rise….

Of course, if you are “poor” enough, you get quite a bit for your kids from Uncle Sugar guaranteed without having to win any lottery.

If you get it, I think you should give thanks to God and spend it (no “benefits-revolution” bullying  on this blog, thank you).  But it is still sort of sickening since I am pretty certain that most Russians aspire to something like our standard of living.

Hat tip: John C. Wright 

Don’t waste your late thirties and early forties

Both Dr. Helen and Jon Barlow blogged about this study.

Whether they are mourning the passing of their prime or struggling to cope with the demands of a job and young family, those aged 35-44 invariably hit a mid-life crisis when their happiness level plunges lower than at any other age, according to a study for the Government.

It makes them the least satisfied members of society, scoring well below teenagers, the elderly – and women of all ages.

Researchers found that it takes men until they reach the age of 65 to start enjoying life as much as they did in their late-teens and early-20s.

Actually, if we could trust this interpretation, I think we would see a way to help men 35-44 be happier.  Telling them that they will eventually “get over it” and be much happier in a couple of decades would be quite helpful I think.

But from what I see, as far as we know, the sixty-five-year-olds might always have been happy.  How can we be sure this is a report on the way all males go through life and not a report on specific generations?

Regardless, how do we deal with the problem.

Preparation: Don’t allow yourself to think of youth as the happiest time.
One thing I think doesn’t help is the saying I’ve heard other people say to college students (not my parents, thankfully): “Enjoy yourself!  These are the best years of your life.”  That is, if you think of it, a horribly depressing view that dooms you to pine for your college years forever.

Duration: most bad times can be made worse by wallowing in misery.

There are people you meet who have suffered such loss that all you can do is keep quiet and weep with them.  But for the vast majority of us, we have plenty of blessings, but because a particular one was taken away or never given to us, we decide to ignore everything else and concentrate on mourning for what we don’t have.  As an initial response this may be appropriate, but why let what you can’t have take away what you do have?  Why not focus on the blessings that remain and enjoy them?

I used to think that “happiness is a choice.”  But that is simplistic.  Your emotions are reactions to reality–or they should be.  Happiness is hallucinatory if it is merely volitional.  But for most people, especially for contemporary Americans, there is some reason to be happy, and the choice is whether or not to focus on that reason.

Another problem in Presby Southern partisanism

I wrote this in Trey’s comments and I reproduce it here slightly altered:

Citing J. H. Thornwell’s opposition to the Union seems like a really bad idea, even if he happened to be right.  Thornwell said that one reason the South must secede was because the Federal government would not allow slavery to extend West. He made slavery the essence of the Southern identity saying that the Feds were in effect dictating that Southern men who moved westward do so not as Southern men but as Northern men (the book I read on this was entitled The Metaphysical Confederacy).

I simply cannot stand Thornwell. Thornwell was, in fact, one of the top most important apologists for slavery as well as the South.  He is known to secular historians of the period because of his fame on this issue. His name blackens the reputation of the PCA and I wish we would forget him. At least in Dabney’s case, if one must have a Southern Presbyterian hero, I find actually worthwhile theology. Thornwell’s legacy is simply to make Presbyterians into wet-baby baptists as a matter of principle.

When one finds oneself opposed to the expanded power of the Federal Government, one finds oneself holding a position espoused by all sorts of uglies like Mormon polygamists, skinists, “Christian” polygamists, and other human trash. My strategy is to ignore them. I think we would all be better off doing the same with Thornwell. I’d use Lord Acton or someone who has a deserved reputation for loving justice rather than Thornwell.

Ruling class considerations (& a note to self)

Instead of reading about my new mower last night, I got caught up reading Chrischapter-by-chapter summary of Gatto’s underground history of American education.  So far the big difference between my speculation and Gatto’s history is that Gatto thinks that our ruling class escapes the problems the rest of us face in the public school system.  Whether that is by design or accident, I’ll leave aside.

I’ll have to think about this some more, but Chris is invoking all sorts of anarchic demons I have been trying to suppress.  But it also makes me think of some other books that might have more credibility with some people.  I’ll have to see if I can dig up an old title…

Why the ruling class might resist unschooling

OK, I am not an unschooler and I don’t think I could be one if I wanted to be one. However, experience has led me to appreciated this sort of post more than I would have a decade ago.

The role of fear in all this
It seems to me that the 12-year curriculum is all based on insurance. When a child reaches a certain point he will have many options, it is thought, that he would not have otherwise. For example, if I had been forced against my will to take piano lessons, I might have had entertainment and musical career options open to me later in life that were quite far away from me instead.

I think this is a pretty powerful incentive. People respond to their fears, especially the fear of not preparing their children.

The role of relative scarcity
Then also, we ought to remember how it used to be in pre-modern times when it was almost a given that a child would work his father’s business, or else he was entered into an apprenticeship of many years outside the home. Education was mostly training and it both empowered people and limited them.

Why isn’t seen as necessary? I could see some claiming that the invention of public school began to provide a way to through off the dictates of nature. One could choose one’s profession by proclivity after having many options left open. But I think the wealth increase of the industrial revolution played a part. People were glad to be given a trade because they wanted to have some reasonable chance of gaining the necessities of life. But as we became filthy rich (as a society we are incredibly wealthy) we simply ceased to find those necessities so hard to grasp.

The system cuts off options even as it may give some options
And arguably, the 12-year curriculum cuts off the best options. If I want to enroll my child in band, typically I have to add this on to a work load that remains unchanging. This means, by definition, that a person who is more musically gifted but not as gifted in other areas, will not be as likely to practice music. Homework time will eat away at everything else. The only people who will be likely to explore and build on their musical gifts will be those who are already naturally gifted in other areas so that they can get the homework out of the way.

What is the education ideal of the 12-year Curriculum?

In this video, the speaker suggest the academic professor is the ideal of the school system. But I wonder if it is something else. Since the industrial revolution we have seen managerial elites in both government and business basically run the world. I wonder if they are not preserving an educational system that assumes desk jockeying is the basic posture of productive human effort. Belonging to a corporate system. Being supervised and constantly evaluated on paper. These are the marks of the ruling culture.

But while I have no problem admitting that such rule can be appropriate and beneficial, I wonder if they would have the same kind of hold on us if we didn’t have the sort of educational system that we have.

The schools assume that the one who thrives in that sort of regimented environment is the ideal person.

Attention PCA members

I just got this in my email:

To: ByFaith Readers
From: Dick Doster, Editor
Subject: Survey on the PCA’s Political Involvement

We’re working on an article for the October/November issue of byFaith and wondered if you’d help.

Our story explores attitudes among PCA people toward politics. And we’re especially interested in getting a sense for how 20 and 30-year-olds may think differently from 40 and 50-year-olds. And how 40 and 50-year-olds think differently from 60 and 70-year-olds.

The survey will only take a few minutes. Would you click on the link below, answer the questions (there are six, plus a couple of demographic questions), and add ample comments in the spaces provided?

Your involvement will be a big help as we try to complement and corroborate some of the information we’ve gathered.

Please click here to take the survey:
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.aspx?sm=Nqsj_2bYLv7i5OxScHgwBn3g_3d_3d

And thanks in advance for your help.

For the sake of the kingdom,

Dick Doster
Editor

How they sell skinny pills

(By the way, you’re supposed to click through the picture.)

click thru me

I love this prose:

We never expected the outcry that ensued after Monday’s post regarding, uh, a certain Photoshopped, country-singing, women’s magazine cover-subject. Maybe it’s because many of us have worked for women’s magazines, where the daily parade of malnourished Estonian fourteen-year-olds and full-color glossy page-proofs of airbrushed actresses sort of inured us to the bad business that is selling ‘femininity’. Sort of, that is, because if you’re the kind of woman who cares about other women — or, you know, we guess you could be a man caring about women, that’s allowed here — it’s hard to escape the fact that women, if you believe the media, are increasingly expected to look like female avatars. (Unless they are young girls, in which case, they are supposed to look like hookers).

J. K. Rowling the mother of the turn-of-the-century culture

Got my hair cut today.

I never know how to strike up conversations in those circumstances….

But merely let it drop that that I’m working through Deathly Hallows and suddenly I’m in the middle of a conversation with several people. They all avoid spoilers and instead I learn of the war stories of various readers and how they stood in line on That Night.

Years from now it will be asked: What were you doing when HP7 was released.

More than Lewis or Tolkien, Rowling has invented the myth that will be the common coin of everyone in the world where it is translated.

Of course, her debt to Tolkien is obvious. If she is the mother then Tolkien is the grandfather.

Non-heterosexual “union” creates strange bedfellows

The NPR Fresh Air interview with the lovers who started “Big Love” is an interesting window into politics and drama. I tried to list to it but Calvin got disturbed and asked me to turn it off. Jennifer reported a high point when one of them talked about having to learn new vocabulary and said that the first time he saw the term “sister-wife” he wanted to puke.

I know what you mean, friend. Since I had pretty much the same experience when I heard about domestic partner.

Continue reading

10 Reasons You Should Get a Job

Let me start this by saying that Steve Palina has a lot of worthwhile things to say. Just because I think his 10 Reasons You Should Never Get a Job is pretty flawed does not mean that I disagree with everything else and don’t find other great things on his site to read. I do. Just not his 10 Reasons You Should Never Get a Job.

1. Income for What You’re Best At

First of all, people have different gifts and abilities, as well as resources. It doesn’t follow that the people whose best assets are their own labor for others are stupid or dumb. A brain surgeon, for example, is going to need someone to provide resources such as medical equipment. It is no reflection on his intelligence if he works for a hospital.

Palina’s recommendation of building an income-producing system is only smart if your resulting income is superior to what you will make by “trading time for money.” (this isn’t simply a matter of which brings in more revenue; maybe you would rather make less and work less).

Of course, if you’ve never thought about finding a way to generate revenue without having to “trade time for money,” then reading Palina’s essay might be the best thing that ever happened to you. But that won’t be everyone and it has nothing to do with your intelligence.

The fact is that not everyone can get income in this way. The economy thrives on diversity. There will always be people who work for a living and they aren’t dumb because they do so.

Finally, with a salaried position, you are not simply paid for when you work. Most business owners will tell you that sometimes things are slow and other times they are not. Yet they pay their employees regardless unless business slows down to the point where they are forced to lay people off. What you are paid for is not purely your work. You are paid, essentially, to be on retainer because someone appreciates what you can do for him.

2. Gaining Experience

There are plenty of ways to gain experience, but to be paid while you do so is not a bad way to do it. There have been jobs for which the demand has suddenly ceased, leaving people unequipped to find a comparable income in the marketplace. But, while this has happend, it is also common to find people who have found their jobs lead them in directions they would have never have gone otherwise, providing them with a new way of making of living. A man gets a job doing website design for a company ends up in project management with a much better income (and eventually has the connections and skills to go into business for himself).

Of course, a great deal of the experience really consists in meeting other people, both customers and suppliers and bringing them together. And, besides experience, there is a reputation to build up so that, when the time is right, you might get to move on up into self employment or investing in some asset that generates revenue.

On the other hand, your growth in experience and relationships may make you become a great asset at your job so that you don’t need to do anything else. Maybe not. But you never know and there is no reason to burn bridges unless you are sure it is in your best interests.

3. Domestication

Learning to work with others is a basic human skill, including others who you do not like and who have too much authority. You can try to live life like these situations are completely avoidable. For those who choose such a life, ninety-nine percent of the time they will become worse than the problems they want to avoid. How many victorious rebellions end up creating situations that are worse than the ones they overthrew?

Lets assume Steve’s pejorative description is accurate: jobs are domesticating. Even so, systems of domestication are not always evil for all people at all stages of their lives. Overbearing mothers who try to keep their children from growing up are not an argument against all mothers and all families. The fact that people (maybe many people who will be helped by Steve’s article) will be more hindered than helped by a job, does not mean that “domestication” is always a bad thing.

4. Buying Power

The reason why Walmart can sell at low prices is because they can buy in high quantities and get products sold to them for less. Then they pass on the savings.

Likewise, companies can provide things for you that would be much harder to get if you were to try to go into business with no starting capital of your own. Investors and owners provide equipment you would have to acquire somehow. Other members of the team find customers who want the work you do. Teams can often do more together than any one member could do by himself. This is not always true. People discover they can work more productively on their own at some point. More power to them. But claiming that a company represents “too many mouths” to feed, simply isn’t true in all cases.

5. Reducing Risk

When someone has something of value to offer, the main challenge is spreading the news–finding the people who need the value offered so that they know who to go to. Getting a job means you don’t have to do all that marketing yourself. You just need to reach one person who already has a network.

There is a trade-off of risk here. But usually, if you do a half-decent job and learn some basic social skills, keeping your job is easy. And, you can always save and invest so that you can soften the blow if you are fired.

6. Living In the Herd

One of the basic values one needs to have to be a successful independent business man is to not burn bridges when one is involved in a disagreement. You never know when the person annoying you will be in a position to provide you with something you need. No matter how idiotic a person is being, it is best to extricate yourself in a way that does not leave anyone unnecessarily offended.

Likewise, just because the word “boss” derives from “master” and “bovine”–I’ll not challenge the veracity of the linguistic connection since I have done no research on the subject. But if you can only think of your boss–simply because he is your boss–as an evil bovine master, then I doubt you will be any good as either an employee or an independent business man.

7. Money is given to you by other people; you don’t give it to yourself

The reason why people more often ask their bosses for raises rather than investing in their own income-producing business is because the former is usually much easier than the latter. Not many people go into their own business or live on investments and there is a reason for that: it is much more likely to fail.

I think it is great if you want to go for it, but don’t pretend that earning whatever you want is some sort of easy accomplishment that everyone else would achieve if Only They Weren’t So Stupid.

8. Your Social Life is what you want.

People hang out with people they like and usually who are like them. Sad but true. That is the same whether you are an employee or not.

9. Freedom is making cost/benefits decisions

Corporate rules and regulations can be insane, but usually they are caused by the litigious and over-regulated government-mandated environment that effects all of us whether we have jobs or not. Should you put up with it? Not if you don’t want to. But don’t make that decision on the pretense that you can go to a realm where your behavior is not ever going to be irrationally constrained. It will be as long as you deal with other people. And you will have to deal with other people in order to get money.

10. Fantasizing is not courage

If you are the kind of person who completely conforms to what everyone around you is doing, then you are not going to be a great entrepreneur nor are you going to really excel in your workplace. Either way you need to stand out (especially in possessing the wisdom to know how to stand out).

Blaming all your attitude problems on having a job is a step in the wrong direction. You may indeed be the sort of person who needs to leave, but you won’t do any good on your own if you can’t show greater maturity toward your supervisors and co-workers than to blame them for your own thinking.

Quit Your Job?

Then go for it. But be wise. Do it at the right time and have a plan. If you can find a way to produce passive income then more power to you.

But there is no shame in holding down a job. And it may produce more for you than what you could produce any other way. Why claim otherwise?