Category Archives: books

Two personal bombshells that reinforce my libertarian/Reconstructionist geek cred

I am reading book, written by one of my favorite political columnists, and enjoying it immensely. Naturally, I want to write a big long review and know I’ll never have time. So here are a couple of revelations that shocked and awed me.

It all goes back to Ayn Rand (or to Nietschze)

I thought I knew all about Rothbard’s problems with the Ayn Rand Cult, but there was stuff here that was new and some that was totally breathtakingly unexpected.  I should have figured that Rand, through Nathaniel B-Rand-en as he renamed himself (all incorporating themselves into Her Rationality’s first typewriter brand name), had used counseling as a weapon.  There would be show trials for nonconformists where all private information was used as evidence.  Rothbard had been fooled into submitting to Branden’s treatment as a cure for his travel phobia.  His betrayal and the resulting emotional turmoil must have been immense.  But what was totally new to me is that one of the doctrines (!) that Rand accused Rothbard of believing was in free will!  This was later than 1950.  She became a doctrinaire preacher of free will by the time she wrote Atlas Shrugged, but before she thought that anyone who believed in free will was “insane.”  The impact of Thus Spake Zaruthustra on her thinking was greater than I ever knew (or that any Randian would admit to).

Rushdoony and the Implosion of the Volcker Fund

I was surprised that Rushdonny had this kind of influence.  After reading this I found it mentioned on the web:

The Volcker Fund collapse in 1972 [I think 1962 is what he meant] and destroyed a whole basis of libertarian scholarship. The president was a follower of R.J. Rushdoony, who at the time was a pre-milleniallist Calvinist, later converting to postmillenialism. He has sent me a Rushdoony book, which I blasted. Combined with other reviews, he became convinced that he was surrounded by an atheist, anarchist, pacifist conspiracy to destroy Christianity. so he closed down the Volcker Fund in early 1962. It was a great tragedy. L14S was supposed to be established with the $17 million from the Volcker Fund to be an endowed think-tank, publishing books, sponsoring students, funding research, and holding conferences.

If those two snippets of information are as fascinating to you as to me, then you have found a home on this blog.

Eventually, I will review this at my Goodreads site, and probably write more here.

Anarchy from Middle Earth

“My political opinions lean more and more to Anarchy (philosophically understood, meaning abolition of control not whiskered men with bombs) — or to ‘unconstitutional’ Monarchy. I would arrest anybody who uses the word State (in any sense other than the inanimate realm of England and its inhabitants, a thing that has neither power, rights nor mind); and after a chance of recantation, execute them if they remain obstinate!… Government is an abstract noun meaning the art and process of governing and it should be an offence to write it with a capital G or so as to refer to people… The most improper job of any man, even saints, is bossing other men. Not one in a million is fit for it, and least of all those who seek the opportunity.” — J.R.R. Tolkien

via KarenDeCoster.com Web Log: Tolkien Was a Hoppean Archives.

I think my dad read The Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings to me when I was six or seven.  So no wonder.

Insightful classification of the trio

There is a story told of C. S. Lewis, as a small boy — about six or seven, I think. One day he announced to his father,
“Daddy, I have a prejudice against the French.”
“Why?” asked his father, not unreasonably.”
“If I knew that,” replied the precocious youngster triumphantly, “it wouldn’t be a prejudice.”
He was quite right, of course. The point about a prejudice is that it’s what you have when you are “pre-judging” a case: making your mind up before you know the facts.
Now of course there are many halfway stages between naked prejudice and completely well-informed opinion. Frequently we back up our prejudices by finding out just enough facts that support our case, and conveniently ignoring the rest. Bad historians, clever politicians, and lazy theologians do that all the time.

Acts for Everyone, p.161-162

Instead of a book review

I recently found that I had forgotten/lost some stuff from my last Presbytery meaning.  Out of sight, out of mind, and all that.  I hate this especially because I had intended to read and review for you Dr. Peterson’s (full disclosure: he was one of my systematics professors at my alma mater) Election & Free Will–which I acquired at that meeting.  I have looked through it but haven’t sat down and taken notes to give it a thorough review.

However, I can tell you this:  Typically, I have recommended two resources on the doctrine of unconditional election to eternal life, and then recommended augmentation for both.  The two are Lorraine Boettner’s book and R. C. Sproul’s.  The problem was that Boettner’s is too much for many.  Sproul’s is much better as a short introduction (it is my standard in teaching the doctrine in Sunday School classes).  But neither is especially thorough in their Biblical Theology.  At this point, I think Peterson’s is going to become my standard recommendation because it is both thorough and accessible and and much more devoted to surveying the Bible in a wholistic fashion.  I highly recommend it.  Next time I lead any kind of book study on the subject, this will be the book.

Of course, if you’re not a fellow calvinist, I can’t say you will necessarily appreciate the book as I do.  But you never know!  Why not give it a spin?

Postscript: Since I have neglected to write a real review, I’ll direct you to another blogger who did it right.  However, I emphatically disagree that the book contains an “optional” chapter, or if it does, that it is the one Challies selects as such.

100 Cupboards by N. D. Wilson

I doubt there is much need for me to describe this book.  If you like Stephen King or Dean Koontz, if you like C. S. Lewis (especially The Magician’s Nephew), if you like Tim Powers or James Blaylock (and you really should), if you have any appreciation for urban fantasy (though it is set in rural Kansas, I think the crossover setting still rates the comparison), if you like Neil Gaiman or Harry Potter or Gene Wolfe (especially, duh, There Are Doors), if you like Buffy the Vampire Slayer or Angel, you will love this book.

One of the sad things about marketing is that labels are used in order to attract readers that also repel many more.  This book is YA (Young Adult), but I hope you will all realize that some of the best stories written for anyone at any age are officially YA.

Continue reading

A neat story mined with patches of chloroform

In my review of the comic book, I forgot to mention how weird it was to get “thought bubbles” of text bubbling from Buffy’s head.

You virtually never had that in the TV show. Maybe one episode started with Buffy reading Jack London as a voice-over narration to events, but that was the exception. And you never had anything like Veronica Mars’ tough talking High School PI narrations (which I greatly miss, if anyone cares).

This is another way, in which, Buffy the Vampire Slayer Season Eight, Volume 1: The Long Way Home fails to really be “season eight” of the cancelled TV show.  Using thought bubbles is a sea change in how the story of the slayer gets told.  In the show there was dialog and there was the guess one could make from facial expressions in video.  And that was all.

Which brings me to One Thing Or Your Mother.  It is a genuinely entertaining story for any fan of the TV show, especially since it takes place back in Season Two and even adds a connection between the mayer and Principle Snyder.  I enjoyed it.

But my enjoyment was hampered by billions of paragraphs or successions of paragraphs which, yes I am not ashamed of puning,  painstakingly described every single detail of what the characters were thinking and feeling.  You never infer anything in the story.  It is almost a tract against empricism.  Or an ad absurdum argument that works in its favor.

I’m sure the author, Kirsten Beyer, is a talented writer. She demonstrated her skill in many ways.  No doubt she was writing according to her instructions.  But I found those constraints really irritating.

Awakening (#1 of Chasing Yesterday)

I can’t vouch for all of the writer’s other series–just in case anyone searches Amazon or uses some other search engine (I’ve decided to stop using Google as a verb). I’m also hoping the next two books in the trilogy don’t do anything to make me regret this recommendation. With those caveats in mind: I really enjoyed this book.

If you want to read, or let your kids read (but you shouldn’t let them have all the fun) a scifi, conspiracy, paranoid novella, I think Awakening will serve you well. It has a little of the typical melodramatic over-writing that I think plagues YA publishing (and maybe even sells–how harshly can I criticize immature writing for the less mature?), but not much. And the story/mystery is quite engaging.

The story is about J.D., a roughly fourteen-year-old Jane Doe found at the site of an explosion who wakes up in the hospital without any memory. I can’t say too much more because I don’t want to print any spoilers.

Since I write a lot about Christianity on this blog, I suppose I should point out that I’m not claiming anything in that regard for this story. Just that it was a fun read and I want to read the sequels to find out what happens next. If you’re considering this for your child, my advice is to read it first and make your own decision. Authority figures don’t come off too well in this book, but of course, that’s what makes a story especially scary–when those who should be trustworthy and are supposed to care for you are not and do not.

In any case, the last Christian “novel” I looked at in a store had discussion questions included. God save us!