Monthly Archives: March 2007

“progressively worse through the rest of this century” unless you take away power from us

If you want to know what I was blathering about here, consider President Carter’s hallucinatory speech:

Tonight I want to have an unpleasant talk with you about a problem unprecedented in our history. With the exception of preventing war, this is the greatest challenge our country will face during our lifetimes. The energy crisis has not yet overwhelmed us, but it will if we do not act quickly.

It is a problem we will not solve in the next few years, and it is likely to get progressively worse through the rest of this century.

We must not be selfish or timid if we hope to have a decent world for our children and grandchildren.

We simply must balance our demand for energy with our rapidly shrinking resources. By acting now, we can control our future instead of letting the future control us.

Garbage. The entire nation, and even the world, was going through massive suffering because politicians could not leave people free to make energy choices or trust the market to correct the problem. Yet did Carter face widespread opposition from the press because he was acting like a control-freak and an evangelist, who was causing exactly the sort of “bread line” ills for the nation as Breshnev was doing for the USSR at the time?

No. The opposition was saved for Reagan. Reagan let people buy and sell and and get motivated by high prices to find alternative sources of oil from OPEC and thus drive the prices back down. No preaching necessary. No saviors in Washington needed. No doomsday scenario. And where is the glory of that path?

Yet in a matter of just a few years all the shortages and economic problems were just a memory.

Sorry for ranting. Just feeling a little bit reactionary right now….

Found guilty of being American in Nicaragua while a crime was taking place somewhere in Nicaragua

Please go watch this video.

I recorded this in my links this morning (which will appear later tonight as a blog post), but I think this needs more attention.

Mob hysteria is a rush, probably as pleasurable as sex to most people. The job of the court system is to check it. But all too often (and by no means only in Nicaragua) the justice “system” simply acts to authorize the mob and silence those who would speak against it by claiming that justice has been served (yes, I have been meditating about this a lot recently, but at least I don’t have to be worried about being thrown into an unsanitary hole to rot for thirty years). In this case, the mob will not permit an utter lack of evidence, nor a boatload of counter-evidence, to prevent them from taking this opportunity to destroy a gringo.

I have no idea what the US government should do or can do. But I hope it can be galvanized to do everything possible. Time is ticking.

For those that lived through the 70s to the 80s, what do we know about the relationship between popular news reports and the truth

There isn’t one.

What should be a great empirical fact is that shortages and a decrepit economy were caused by political factors and blamed on natural factors.  It was the environment.  It was over-population.  It was “malaise.” These things caused the economic crisis and long lines waiting to get some gas.

We were assured this was simply the natural order, that we were using up resources.  And it was all false.  These shortages just sort of vaporized after new political policies were put in place.

links for 2007-03-21

Getting it out of your head so you can put better stuff in there

OK, I’m never going to be Merlin Mann, but I had my own personal epiphany during a meeting that sometimes the best way to focus on the speaker is to take notes about other stuff.

One of the really helpful metaphors David Allen uses in his book Getting Things Done is that of RAM in one’s brain. Every project you are working on in your head is using up RAM and hurting your efficiency. You need a reliable way to “catch” everything you might need to do and a disciplined and reliable way of reviewing what is caught. Everything needs to be “outside your brain.”

What’s great about that metaphor is that it really captures why people give up on methods like GTD. GTD itself is another thing that ends up taking up “RAM’ in many peoples’ brains. If you don’t commit to a disciplined approach to learning GTD methodology, then you end up with more distractions rather than less. (And, if you were the kind of person who already had a disciplined approach to getting things done, then you probably wouldn’t need GTD training in the first place!)

When I was taking Greek in college (which I totally had to repeat in seminary), my professor assured the class that getting an A average would be much much easier than maintaining a C average. The course builds on itself. If you get a C one week you will be naturally prone to get a D the following week. Thus, the only way to maintain a C is to continually try to make up for lost time.

Learning GTD involves a similar dynamic. If you don’t really strive at it it becomes just another thing that is not getting done and another thing slowing you down.

I’m not an A student in GTD. I’d like to think that I’m maintaining a B. I don’t think I’m being too harsh or soft on myself in coming up with that grade…. Anyway, I was at a meeting and I was finding it impossible to focus. It’s not that I wasn’t listening. I have the capacity to listen with a lot of distractions (other times I completely space out, but that wasn’t happening in this case). But, even though I was right where I was supposed to be, I kept feeling this nervous impulse to leave and go somewhere else.

It finally occurred to me what the problem was: I hadn’t really been reviewing the things I was collecting that needed to be thought through and documented. I had a bunch of things I needed to do beginning with figuring out everything I needed to do.

So my grade in GTD was pretty low. But i did have one thing going for me. I had made a point of buying a spiral-bound pad of perforated index cards. I got the spiral because it was big enough to stick a pen into.

So I took out my pad and began writing everything I could think of in small notes. It took thirty seconds. I had assumed it would take longer, but it didn’t. As soon as you have more things worrying you than you can encompass in one thought, it seems, by definition, like you have an eternity of tasks. As soon as an external list is begun, the list becomes finite.

And I was instantly calm. I was able to stop fidgeting and not only listen but listen with appreciation. It was like flipping a switch.

Michael Hyatt has a great post on the art of note-taking. I will add to it, that, while note-taking can help you stay engaged, it might sometimes be helpful to jot down notes about other stuff–stuff that is keeping you from being engaged. This isn’t ideal, but if you find yourself distracted by projects that need attention, and you can’t focus on why you’re at the meeting, it might be worth it simply to jot down everything you can think of at the bottom of your page (you can start from the last line and work up to save space). Why the bottom? Because you want to be able to tear off that part of the sheet of paper and detach it from your real notes and throw it into your in-box.

Oh, that reminds me. This probably worked because I have already put an in-box on my desk. Without it my note jotting might not have worked so well. Because I knew I could tear off the card and throw it in my in-box, I knew I wouldn’t lose it or forget to review it. David Allen talks about people who think that in-boxes are for other people to give you stuff. No, the in-box is for you as well–to have a place where you know you will be able to find everything you have to do.

I repeat that this is not ideal. But if you are not able to focus, there is no harm in trying. Let me know if you try it if you think it works.

links for 2007-03-20