Hi Mark,
I too have devoted a considerable amount of time on proving the efficacy of Infant Baptism. I just revisited the Rich Lusk article – BAPTISMAL EFFICACY AND THE REFORMED TRADITION: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE and would like to offer my critique of the same for review and comment. I have come to recognize a Covenant deficiency within the Reformed theology that has caused considerable confusion in their academic circles. For your convenience, I have posted the article with my critique on my site – http://www.the-aaron-papers.net
God’s blessings
Aaron
![[ theologia ]](http://www.hornes.org/theologia/images/theologia_title.jpg)
Hi Mark,
I too have devoted a considerable amount of time on proving the efficacy of Infant Baptism. I just revisited the Rich Lusk article – BAPTISMAL EFFICACY AND THE REFORMED TRADITION: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE and would like to offer my critique of the same for review and comment. I have come to recognize a Covenant deficiency within the Reformed theology that has caused considerable confusion in their academic circles. For your convenience, I have posted the article with my critique on my site – http://www.the-aaron-papers.net
God’s blessings
Aaron
Comment by Aaron Randall — July 2, 2008 @ 9:53 am