Category Archives: political-economy

Steven Wedgeworth on the 2 Kingdoms

The past few years have seen a number of publications putting forth the thesis that the Protestant Reformation held to a belief in natural law and advocated a socio-political theory known as the “two kingdoms.” This has been construed as a move away from a previous consensus that the Reformation and Calvinism in particular believed that their faith was for all of life and that Christ’s mission required a transformation of culture. That concept, it is argued, should be understood as “neo-Calvinism” and is actually a step away from the Reformation tradition. Complicating the discussion is the fact that this is not merely a historical debate, but indeed a competition between contemporary political programs.[1] In what follows I will argue that the Reformation did indeed advocate natural law and a distinction between two kingdoms, but this was not a precursor to modern political Liberalism. In fact, the Reformers’ understanding of the two kingdoms served as a primary apologetic for the reform of the church by the civil magistrate.

Read the rest at Two Kingdoms Critique.

If you need your terror today

There are some people that, no matter what I’m doing when I hear them, I have to stop and listen. On the short list, very near the top, is Mohamed El-Erian of bond investment giant, PIMCO.

via Jiminger.Com » The New Normal.

Go watch the video.

I am still avoiding this mostly, but I still visit blogs and other social media and when I suffer fear I still tend to share it.

God has us in his hand. The only thing I can suggest is pray and move on.  Jesus preached the sermon on the mount in a time of crisis as well:

24 “No one can serve two masters, for either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and money.

25 “Therefore I tell you, do not be anxious about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on. Is not life more than food, and the body more than clothing? 26 Look at the birds of the air: they neither sow nor reap nor gather into barns, and yet your heavenly Father feeds them. Are you not of more value than they? 27 And which of you by being anxious can add a single hour to his span of life? 28 And why are you anxious about clothing? Consider the lilies of the field, how they grow: they neither toil nor spin, 29 yet I tell you, even Solomon in all his glory was not arrayed like one of these. 30 But if God so clothes the grass of the field, which today is alive and tomorrow is thrown into the oven, will he not much more clothe you, O you of little faith? 31 Therefore do not be anxious, saying, ‘What shall we eat?’ or ‘What shall we drink?’ or ‘What shall we wear?’ 32 For the Gentiles seek after all these things, and your heavenly Father knows that you need them all. 33 But seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.

34 “Therefore do not be anxious about tomorrow, for tomorrow will be anxious for itself. Sufficient for the day is its own trouble (Matthew 6).

A really great illustration for common grace and Christians in politics

Bringing it home to our point, we reject John Stuart Mill, not liberty. We reject Ayn Rand, not liberty. Indeed, if we understand what the Spirit of God is doing in the world (2 Cor. 3:17), we reject idolatrous accounts of individual freedoms because we love liberty. I look dubiously at the medicine man who shuffles around in a heathenish circle shaking his rattle, but I must still receive the rain with gladness. If I reject the rain because of the medicine man, then I am actually rejecting Christ (Acts 14:17).

via Look at All Those Alabaster Cities.

Wait no, I must add the conclusion even though it is not included in the point I was linking…:

If we accept the need for the kind of open Jesus-is-Lord-theocracy, of the kind argued for by Wilson, then bad things might start to happen.

Right. What might happen? If we bowed the knee to Jesus Christ, might we start murdering over a million kids in the womb a year? If we acknowledged Christ, might it lead to sodomite parades in the streets of our major cities? If we confessed that Jesus rose from the dead, might we suddenly be on the brink of of a major war in the Middle East? If we allowed that our government is junior to the government of Christ in Heaven, might we then rush to spend trillions of dollars we don’t have? This is a good point, certainly, and I never thought of it that way before. I can see why people wouldn’t want to turn away from the secular paradise we have built. I mean, look at all those alabaster cities out there, undimmed by human tears.

Reminds me of an accusation against anarchist libertarians claiming they are trying to repeal the 20th century. And the response: The era of mass murder in mass war and genocide? Who wouldn’t want to repeal that monster?

Another government “success” is revealed to be a bubble

The Baltimore Sun reports that education officials have uncovered rampant cheating at George Washington Elementary School. According to the Sun, school administrators may have cheated their way to better test scores, helping them win the prestigious Blue Ribbon Award, reserved for the top schools in the nation.

Officials discovered that wrong answers on the tests were erased and the right ones filled in.

At the center of the scandal is 60-year-old Susan Burgess. WJZ spoke to the principal in 2007 when the school received the designation.

“The misconception is that the city schools are not meeting the needs of the children and are failing and that’s not true at all,” said Burgess.

At the time Burgess was hailed as an educational hero, turning one of the poorest schools in the city into one of the most successful.

Read the rest Rampant Cheating Found At City Elementary School – wjz.com.

Do we need the state to outlaw discrimination against marines? What would Rand Paul say?

Web postings claim a Stockton sandwich shop refused to serve Marines at lunch on Monday, and the talk has led to a boycott of the eatery.

Calls for the boycott were posted on Facebook pages for the Department of Defense and other sites across the Web.

Posters claim that that Marine recruiters in Stockton were refused service at this Charley’s Grilled Subs in Weberstown Mall.

Franchise store owner Jian Ortman said she’s scared. Phone calls have been coming in nonstop from across the country, some with threats.

via Marines Refused Service At Eatery? Claims Fly Online – Sacramento News Story – KCRA Sacramento.

This is directly related to the Rand Paul panic. Do we require a new law to protect servicemen from discrimination? Or can we let society handle it? (Assuming the story is true and the incident happened.)

Human depravity and political philosophy

Humans are sinful.  This means they often hurt and exploit one another.

How does a Christian deal with the problems that arise in society as a result of human depravity?

One common response is to recommend civil government.

I think it is right to recommend civil government on the basis of Romans 13 and other passages.

But this involves faith, not some deduction about human depravity.

Because depravity affects the civil magistrate as much as anyone else.

The civil magistrate is not an angel but a man.

Giving a person lethal power to use on other people is not self-evidently a solution to human depravity in society.

But one might see that human depravity would give rise to gangsterism, and that the best strategy for Christians would be to recruit/disciple/convert the most powerful gangster.

Also, Augustine never mentioned that an emperor could probably guarantee safe passage to ships that paid him protection, whereas a sea infested with smaller pirates would simply be unsafe.

But this works better the smaller the ruling class.

The only way the civil magistrate can really improve society is if the ones holding office are of better character than those they rule.

What if “the civil magistrate” is several bureaucracies of thousands of people?

How does one ameliorate the problem of human depravity by giving lethal power to a giant corporation with revolving officers?

The Rand Paul hoopla, or Why I Can’t Stand Christian State-Moralists (since someone asked)

Why in God’s name is it legal for KKK and other racist groups to get licenses to use public property to propagate their filth?

Oh, I forgot.  Every man, woman, and child has a sacred right to express their views even if it involves blocking traffic.

OK, fine. I think it’s debatable but, for the sake of argument, lets agree with the ACLU and Liberals and Conservatives everywhere that idiot racists (redundant) have a right to express themselves on public property.

If I agree that they have that right am I a racist?  Am I a promoter of White Supremacism?

If I think the Drug War is a horrible policy and that the entire “controlled substance” network of bullets and prisons needs to be entirely dismantled does that prove I want to give cocaine to children?

If I want the US Military out of Afghanistan and Iraq (and Korea, Germany, and every other country) does that mean I am Islamic?

But if I think we should (at least at the Federal level) stop watching over shopkeepers to make sure they don’t discriminate among their customers, that makes me a racist?

Advocating the contrived right of using public property to express views is liberal and permissible but advocate that people who own property can share it with whomever they want without getting crushed by federal police power and I’m worse than a liberal?

What would happen if tomorrow the Federal laws all disappeared and some moron tried to destroy their customer base by eliminating minorities from it?  He wouldn’t just lose the minorities.  He would lose most everyone else.  And the same right of discrimination that he decided to use would be used against him by all his neighbors.  He would be crushed.

Without one politician having anything to do with it.

Society can and does regulate morality without needing to threaten to kill people for not conforming.

I am not saying that this was the situation in 1964.  I am totally thankful that God used tyrannical social engineering to get us out of a horrible cultural situation. People who act like rotten children get treated like rotten children–they get a spanking. That’s the lesson of exile in Babylon.

But we’re facing other kinds of horror now.  And much of it in my opinion is due to the powers that politicians have claimed for themselves. So if someone wants to say that all property owners, of every race, ethnicity, and creed, have the right to do what they want with their own, I think attacking him is uncalled for.

By the way, the reason why businesses were able to practice discrimination in some states and stay in business was because the state passed laws requiring them to do so.  No owner of a bus would tell his customers where to sit, racist or not.  Money talks louder than prejudice. It takes politics to drown it out.

For some historical food for though, consider this wikipedia article.  My favorite part:

Black taxi drivers charged ten cents per ride, a fare equal to the cost to ride the bus, in support of the boycott. When word of this reached city officials on December 8, 1955, the order went out to fine any cab driver who charged a rider less than 45 cents.

Cities still have that municipal fascist lock on taxis.  That was never changed. Poor people with cars should be able to start their own taxi business but local overlords will not let them.

It may be unlawful but it is not really theft

The title of this brief blog post may overreach since I’m not going to provide some kind of ethical analysis going back to the Bible.  (For a stab at that see John Frame’s essay and Vern Poythress’ thoughts.)

Rather, I just want to point out that, according to the U.S. Constitution law it is misleading to claim that using copyrighted material is “stealing.”

The period of history in North America that gave us the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution had a lot to say about “rights” and how they are not given by government and how no one should violate them.

So if it were widely believed that there is a natural right to gain exclusive profit from ideas or writing or songs or technological designs, one would not expect the following to be in the Constitution:

The Congress shall have Power… To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

But it is.

Do you see the point? This isn’t the protection of a natural right; it is a government-granted monopoly believed necessary in order to promote a public good.  And it is explicitly stated that this “exclusive Right” is to be temporary.

(I note in passing that the Constitution doesn’t empower congress to throw large wads of taxpayer cash at these authors and inventors.  Granting them a temporary exclusi.ve right is thought to be as much subsidy as is necessary.)

So while it is important to obey the law, it is also important to not get beaten down by false accusations that downloading a movie is the same as stealing a car.  This is one reason why such propaganda is wrong.

Wilderness rescue and the price system

CARPE DIEM: Yeah, What’s Wrong With Price Gouging? Nothing!.

Thanks go to Kirk Nelson for forwarding this to me.

I remember when I was road-tripping to my first pastorate and our van broke down in the middle of Nowhere, Oregon.  (Actually I think we were 20 miles past Baker City or something similar.)

We had four to transport and a car to tow.  That was too many to ride in the cab of the tow truck, especially since one was pretty much still a baby and another was a toddler.

So the people we called agreed to rent us a car for a day.  They brought it with the tow truck and then our van replace the vehicle we were renting.

It was a wreck.  It cost us $50 and we had it for less than an hour before we returned it and checked into our hotel room.

I was so thankful someone out in the middle of nowhere had the foresight and motivation to buy the equipment needed and keep it on hand for the occasional stranded person.

I guess I should have condemned him for price-gouging.  Whenever I’m in bad circumstances I should have the right to enslave other people’s property, time and labor.

Yes, that would be the Christian way.  Instead, like mindless bourgeois thralls, we thanked God for the profit motive.