Category Archives: culture & value

Big corporations don’t merely sell out Chinese dissidents to their government

One telecom company said “no.” It was Qwest. The Qwest response to overtures was simple: “We’d love to work with you on this. But you do need to change the law so we can do it legally.” Apparently as soon as that happened, Qwest lost a series of important government contracts. And the next thing you know, the Justice Department was feverishly working on a criminal investigation looking at Qwest’s CEO on insider trading allegations—amidst very strange dealings between the Justice Department and the federal judge hearing the case. Of course, this is all the purest coincidence. Or maybe not. What kind of society does this sound like?

Here’s a confession: I actually don’t know what I think about Ron Paul when I think of all the responsibilities of a president. And I, frankly, get tired of hearing about what a perfect document the Constitution is and how it should be followed forever and ever world without end.

But sometimes I don’t care. I just want to vote for the guy who will spend his term trying to destroy these bureaucracies. Just promise you will raise unemployment in the Virginia and Maryland capital suburbs by, say, ninety percent, and you will have my vote.

The question is now before the Senate for a vote on the telecom amnesty bill. As usual, the White-Flag Democrats are abandoning opposition to the Administration’s initiative and are laying the foundation for it to be steamrolled through the Senate. Harry Reid’s conduct in particular has been reprehensible and spineless. This vote is a milestone on the road to serfdom. It’s time to put up a roadblock instead. Write or phone your senator immediately and advise them that you oppose the grant of amnesty for warrantless surveillance to telecommunications companies and that you expect them to do the same.

I hope you won’t take this the wrong way — you, the mom on the cell phone flipping your check card to your kid so she can buy the jeans that say SPANK ME on them — but you’re going down, witch.

Pretty good piece

Just for old times’ sake, I wandered through the 4-6X section. It was just an arm’s length away, but it was the difference between a Happy Meal at the playground and bulimia at the bar. So far, these clothes had been left mercifully untouched by the wand of the skank fairy, whom I envision as looking a lot like Tara Reid.

Instead of being able to buy pretty things for my daughter, sweet somethings in ice cream colors, I must now shop at big, boxy unisex stores where you can still buy shorts that don’t say DELICIOUS on the bottom or T-shirts that are plain instead of, swear to God, a size 7 belly shirt with MADE YA LOOK on the front. Look at what? There’s not supposed to be anything to look at on a seven-year-old. Because they’re children.

Sweet Jesus, what I’d do for a lousy ladybug collar on a smocked dress. Instead, this season’s Easter look consisted of sequined and chiffon body-hugging sheaths. I know that my daughter and I will fight about clothes in a few years, perhaps horribly, but, for now, there will be none of this Little Ladies of the Night look.

And while moms and daughters have always fought over clothes (let’s face it, even Marcia Brady wore some shockingly short dresses, and those baby-doll pj’s in front of stepbrother Greg were icky), the clothing wars were usually taking place between mom and teen, not mom and first-grader.

When you see a size 7 shirt that says SEXY! or a mom and her little girl strolling through the mall in matching shorts with JUICY scrawled across the butt, you have to wonder what the hell is going on.

The saddest part about all this is that if you dress like you’re a twenty-two-year-old going out to a club after a tough day at work in the city, you don’t get to enjoy being a little kid.

Deliver me from an outraged third-grader who thinks she’s entitled to the entire line at Abercrombie & Fitch. Put on a normal pair of jeans and go play kickball, you brat! And tell yo mama I said so.

But I guess it all depends.  As a member of the Evangelical ghetto (the few, but the oh so proud), I’ve got a subculture that usually reinforces something a little less insane.  I haven’t asked Jennifer, but I think there are places to shop outside New York City that give better options.

Assurance during the sixteenth-century reformation

Luther had issues regarding the assurance that God loved him and would welcome into resurrection glory.

It is pretty easy to assume that widespread issues of assurance in the following decades were of the same sort.

But maybe not.

There was another factor that needs to be given due weight.

Suddenly there were leaders opposing one another claiming the other was a sure way to damnation and they were revealing the way of salvation.

For the illiterate majority that had to decide who to trust, it must have been a pretty unnerving dilemma.

The printing presses were the first servers

Following up on my mention of my new reading, I should mention I am reading about the “pamphlet revolution” right now. Awhile back I made this off-the-cuff remark about Luther as the first blogger. Reading about the new market for exciting pamphlets that sprang up at the end of the 15th and beginning of the 16th century, I suspect my label “web 0.0” might be more apt than I was willing to admit.

I was also surprised at how low literacy rates really were in the 1520s. But that didn’t stop the pamphlets from being valued. The fact that the culture was predominately oral simply meant that they were read out loud a lot. Also, much of the mass-produced propaganda consisted of illustrated satirical cartoons. So they could be appreciated by the non-literate.

I almost feel sorry for the authorities in the various German and Swiss provinces and cities. In their fathers’ day, when you had to deal with a “miscreant,” you only needed to banish him and the problem was forever solved. Now you banished a guy and, the following week, his latest attack on you was being read aloud in every tavern in the area. And the next week more brand new material was being circulated.

Ozment at one point claims that the Reformation could have happened without the printing press at all. I have a hard time believing this. This is especially true of the academic revolution that took place. I remember some awesome lectures by Hughes Oliphant Old on the history of the Reformation. I don’t think we can emphasize enough how much the printing press altered the situation for schools. At one time, consulting the works of Augustine, involved learning which monastary housed a copy of the writing in question and traveling for days and weeks and months to go read it.

Within a few decades that was all done. These works were being printed up and sent everywhere.

The first Internet was made of paper and ink.

With no respect intended for John Lennon…

Imagine….

Imagine waking up one day in an alternative universe. Most things were the same. There was still a congress and an elected President who was the commander in chief and the leader of the free world. Democracy was still praised as the American way.

Oh… but the entire life of the nation was ruled by an economic dictator in a quasi-private banking institution who was appointed to office rather than having to ever be elected by anyone. Imagine one such dictator, once retired, willing to openly admit they spoke nonsense when questioned by Congress, and expressing outrage that an elected leader of the free world would ever dare try to impose his desires on his economic rule.

Yeah, that would be strange. Except you don’t have to imagine anything. No matter how dreamlike it seems, that is actually the system. We live in it.

Modern “Western Civilization” simply makes no sense at all.

Harry Potter world: what he said

Tony Felich says some dismissive things about Harry Potter in light of the recent Dumbledore outing, but in the process says all that a Christian appreciator of the story needs to say.

I understand the age we live in, such “outings” of people are considered progressive and en vogue, but come on already. Can you imagine, In Lewis’ day, readers wondering about the sexuality of the professor because he’s single, living alone? How about the readers of Tolkein wondering about the sexuality of Gandalf (OK…never mind that one..)? But you get my drift. Such a decision by Rowlings is so boring and typical of our pop culture.

Pretty much it. Rowling goes into my Susan Howatch category of worthwhile liberal Christian authors, except that Howatch’s problems are actually in the stories. Rowling’s story is untainted. As far as I’m concerned, her opinion on Dumbledore right now is no more important than anyone else’s. It is like Ray Bradbury insisting that Fahrenheit 451 is not about censorship.

Sadly, for the movies, I think all bets are off.

Health Care BS

What an aptly named blog.

Duh, Libertarians oppose murder as an act of aggression and believe it should be stopped by government or by ethical people (since libertarian anarchists don’t believe in government at all–but that would not be Ron Paul’s position).  If a Libertarian believes abortion is murder he is quite likely to oppose it and he should oppose it.

For too many people “reasoning”involves rationalizing whatever sexual utopia they want no matter what.  They don’t even understand people who reason from principles and stick to them.  They can only assume such people have a perverse desire for something bad and are making up reasons to get there. Pure projection.

By the way:

Libertarians for Life

Atheist &  Agnostic ProLife League

ProLife Alliance of Gays and Lesbians

LeftOut: A Haven for Progressive ProLifers

Figuring out that you shouldn’t kill babies isn’t only within the abilities of “conservatives” or any other one religious or political group.  If you want to kill babies you’re going to have to explain your preference without leaning on your politics as your excuse.

The Graying of Kindgarten

In some places they also do it to get bigger football players.  Make them repeat early grades too, sometimes.  No, I’m not joking.

When we did our short-lived  stint in public school this was advocated by teachers as much as parents.  “Your son is bored and restless in class so we think it would be good for him to go through the same material next year.”

I guess we are a weird society in what we think should be common and what should be particular.  Marriage?  That’s not a public concern at all.  Education Curriculum?  He need a giant factory to toss all the different children into and they will all come out the other side just the way we want them.  If a kid is not adept in being subject to mass production, then he needs to be shoved through that stage of the machine a second time.

Let us finally consider how naive it is altogether to say: “Man ought to be such and such!” Reality shows us an enchanting wealth of types, the abundance of a lavish play and change of forms—and some wretched loafer of a moralist comments: “No! Man ought to be different” … He even knows what man should be like, this wretched bigot and prig: he paints himself on the wall and comments, “Ecce homo!”

Obviously, I’d apply this differently than Nietzsche.  But it does seems to point to the abuse embedded in a public education philosophy.

Why can’t TV execs think ahead?

This pretty much sums up what is wrong with Television dramas and the decision-makers:

Spike TV is hoping “A.M.P.E.D.” can build on “Blade: The Series,” which drew solid ratings for its premiere in June but fell off as the summer progressed. The network has decided not to pick the show up for a second season.

OK, I am no expert on TV or anything, but I’m pretty confident that you don’t build on a show by canceling it.

TV shows have the ability to be so much interesting than movies.  But at least I know my average movie is not going to stop end at the beginning or in the middle.