My point is not to defend Murray’s thesis (though I do affirm it), but to draw attention to the manner in which Professor Clark criticizes it. He does mention several Scriptures, with whose interpretation of Murray’s he disagrees, but this is not the main point of his criticism, and he spends little time on the Bible. Rather, Professor Clark complains that “Mr Murray’s argument was taken entirely [emphasis in original] from Scripture.” Clark finds this “biblicism” untenable for a Reformed theologian.

Read the whole sad thing here: Are We Losing Sola Scriptura?.