Here Doug responds to an OPC pastor who–taking into account the sort of things said by others including “doctors” in that denomination–seems representative of the group. I hear all the time about Doug’s serrated edge and other nasty things. Yet here he does not once even raise the question about what these massive falsehoods uttered in a public forum mean for the writer’s character.
Here’s a modest proposal: if people want to claim that the doctrines of free grace don’t lead to license and antinomianism, they should endeavor to comport themselves in ways that don’t look like they are utterly possessed by a spirit of license and antinomianism.
If the Gospel is so important, what do you think God thinks about people who use it’s value in order to publicly engage in false accusations?
Calling Evangelical Christians, “liberal,” both falsely and baselessly, is something God hates.
One hesitates place the labels of antinomian or licentious on the chest of proud men. They embrace the titles and further embrace their error, pointing you to Jesus the friend of winebibbers and sinners.
Every son whom the Father loves is winked at, given noogies and sent on his way.
al sends
Where is Pastor Bordow’s posting? Is it on the OPC list?
I have heard someone else compare Doug Wilson to a liberal. They were operating on the theory that any deviation from the WCF is a form of liberalism. (Tell that to the Reformed Baptists.) Even if Doug Wilson is 100% wrong about everything and has “666” tattooed on his forehead, he is something other than a liberal.