This conversation is going better than I had hoped.  I’m impressed!

However, the Reformed Reader seems to think the Heidelberg Catechism boldly affirms the imputation of the active obedience of Christ when the primary author affirmed no such thing. Secondly, he also seems to think that a dual justification is a novel idea as opposed to the classic view, but I was taught dual justification by the Classic Reformed Scholastics.

Of course, the classic view may be wrong.  I wouldn’t mind a moratorium on the term in theological discussion either way.