John Calvin, Genevan Catechism, on sacraments, 1

Master. – Seeing it is the proper office of the Holy Spirit to seal the promises of God on our minds, how do you attribute this to the sacraments?

Scholar. – There is a wide difference between him and them. To move and affect the heart, to enlighten the mind, to render the conscience sure and tranquil, truly belongs to the Spirit alone; so that it ought to be regarded as wholly his work, and be ascribed to him alone, that no other may have the praise; but this does not at all prevent God from employing the sacraments as secondary instruments, and applying them to what use he deems proper, without derogating in any respect from the agency of the Spirit.

Master. – You think, then, that the power and efficacy of a sacrament is not contained in the outward element, but flows entirely from the Spirit of God?

Scholar. – I think so; viz., that the Lord hath been pleased to exert his energy by his instruments, this being the purpose to which he destined them: this he does without detracting in any respect from the virtue of his Spirit.

Master. – Can you give me a reason why he so acts?

Scholar. – In this way he consults our weakness. If we were wholly spiritual, we might, like the angels, spiritually behold both him and his grace; but as we are surrounded with this body of clay, we need figures or mirrors to exhibit a view of spiritual and heavenly things in a kind of earthly manner; for we could not otherwise attain to them. At the same time, it is our interest to have all our senses exercised in the promises of God, that they may be the better confirmed to us.

Master. – If it is true that the sacraments were instituted by God to be helps to our necessity, is it not arrogance for any one to hold that he can dispense with them as unnecessary?

Scholar. – It certainly is; and hence, if any one of his own accord abstains from the use of them, as if he had no need of them, he contemns Christ, spurns his grace, and quenches the Spirit.

Master. – But what confidence can there be in the sacraments as a means of establishing the conscience, and what certain security can be conceived from things which the good and bad use indiscriminately?

Scholar. – Although the wicked, so to speak, annihilate the gifts of God offered in the sacraments in so far as regards themselves, they do not thereby deprive the sacraments of their nature and virtue.

Master. – How, then, and when does the effect follow the use of the sacraments?

Scholar. – When we receive them in faith, seeking Christ alone and his grace in them.

(source)

5 thoughts on “John Calvin, Genevan Catechism, on sacraments, 1

  1. matthew

    Mark, what do you make of the third answer? It seems problematic to me. Doesn’t it seem to imply that my body is somehow extrinsic to me (‘we are surrounded by this body of clay’), and that being corporeal is a weakness?

    Reply
  2. mark Post author

    Yes.

    It is weird really. We have here a confession that it is totally appropriate for God to institute sacraments for us and for us to be thankful to Him for doing so and to take advantage of them.

    Yet somehow we are also made to feel dirty and unclean for needing them and to wish for a “better” way to apprehend God’s grace.

    Of course, as sinners we are dirty and unclean, but being bodies is not inherently sinful nor should we look at it as a limitation on some other “real” self that is “inside.”

    Reply
  3. pduggie

    What for calvin, is the ‘entire’ power and efficacy of the preached word? Is it the Spirit? is this where Barth gets his stuffs?

    I’m trying to recast this with just ‘the word’ as the sacraments, and it gets even stranger. Like, it would be great if the Spirit could, like with the angels, communicate wordlessly (oxymoron), but since we need words to convey information, apparently words have to be used.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: Calvin, sacraments, bodies, grrrr « sed contra

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *