What is the deal with (allegedly) Westminsterian Presbyterianism?

The Westminster Assembly ruled that justification was neither from eternity or at the time of the cross but rather at the point of effectual calling. They ruled that faith was not bare assent but an act of the will. They taught there will be given a verdict according to works at the Last Judgment and made room so that both those who believe in the imputation of the active obedience of Christ and those who didn’t could both be included.

So now we make common cause with people who believe in eternal justification and that faith is merely assent to attack people for believing in a final verdict accoding to works and for saying it is not necessary to include active obedience in what is imputed (assuming that is even accurate).

What is the deal?

3 thoughts on “What is the deal with (allegedly) Westminsterian Presbyterianism?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *