You can find it here:
As a result of our study, we recommend that the PCA continue the practice defined in our standards and administer the Lord’s Supper “only to such as are of years and ability to examine themselves.”
That the Committee on Paedocommunion prepare an annotated bibliography of sources both for and against the practice, and that resources be collected by the Committee for distribution to those who request them (at the requesters’ cost) to study this matter further.
So, the official decision is that A) no one on either side get accused of heresy, B) that the practice of the PCA remain credocommunionist, and C) that the denomination’s committee provide materials for both side of the debate so that anyone in the PCA or out of it can continue to study the matter.
What this means is that attacks on the integrity of PCA churches who practice credocommunion because their pastor or session wishes that the PCA would Reform its practice, and attempt to promote study of the matter, are attacks on the majority report and the decision of the whole denomination.
That’s very interesting, as are your tags as always.
Pingback: Once More With Feeling » Blog Archive » Paedocommunion: why the opposition?