The first is on John Williamson Nevin and the second on “pietists v. confessionalists.”
This is both great stuff for its own sake, but also shows, in my opinion, how recent controversialists have vastly simplified the theological landscape make a certain agenda look plausible.
Thanks, Mark, for the shout-out….
“… recent controversialists have vastly simplified the theological landscape make a certain agenda look plausible.”
Ahem… was that a shot at me or Darryl (or both)?
Neither. If you wanted to simplify the landscape you would consider positive comments about Nevin off limits.
I was saying something nice mainly about Hart but also about you.
Sorry if I disappointed anyone’s expectations!
Got it. Thanks again, Mark….