No, I didn’t make it through the whole book…
Category Archives: offsite
A few marginal comments on a sanity check for publishers
Joel J. Miller: Author of The Revolutionary Paul Revere-Sanity Check for Publishers.
A few thoughts come to me, perhaps all of which are redundant with what Joel is saying. Consider this public print processing (and then say that three times fast).
- The advice to provide content reminds me of the urge to increase interest in church by providing entertainment. The Church is never going to be more entertaining than my Nintendo Wii (except when it has bricked as it has this week, but you see my point). You can try to get people intrigued or interested, but they have to want something that church actually provides as church. Anything that gets in the way of the church doing what it does as church isn’t helping church survive or grow; it is morphing it into something else that people (allegedly at least) want.
- Books compete against many things. They compete against movie tickets, dvds, coffee, and beer. Proposing that publishers also distribute for microbreweries is not helpful advice for publishers. Stock holders diversify. People with a vocation do what they think they are called to do. If they need to switch to another line of work because of market realities, then they need to admit that they can no longer work in the publishing industry.
- Publishers cannot do much to control how much of the population is literate. There is no point in agonizing. Either there are enough readers to support a healthy publishing industry or there are not. If people prefer gadgets to reading, so be it. Don’t confuse a decision to get out of publishing and sell programs with gadgets with innovation in publishing.
- People who bring a new product to market are sometimes amazing entrepreneurs. We hear about those people. We don’t hear about the many more whose innovation was a failure in the marketplace. It may be true that someone is going to come up with an audio-visual content on a device that will attract readers from books in great numbers. But that person is taking an immense risk. Personally, I would stick with books. Maybe I’m just not courageous enough. Whatever the case, taking a fantastic risk in the marketplace should not be mistaken for the claim that there is a great wave of change sweeping through the industry that demands that everyone adapt to, or die.
- I seem to remember a decade or two ago that cd-roms were going to be the most amazing thing ever in educational content. Did it happen? There are a few products that people buy, but it hardly transformed the world. I can’t help but wonder if the recent things that Joel heard are simply another version of the cd-rom hype–this time applied to small computing devices, perhaps.
- And to repeat a point I’ve made before, there is no comparison between music and books not only for the reason Joel mentions, but because music has always required a player. Unlike recorded music, books have been around before the twentieth century. It is not as obvious that they will be surpassed.
- Personally, I think book publishing took its big hits with the invention of the radio, motion picture, and television. I don’t think the recent stuff is that big a deal. We’re past the real hurdles already.
I can’t believe someone saw so clearly where the Constitution would lead us!
“I foresee the day when rights will subsume responsibilities, where the poor and the despised will become wage slaves of the elites; and the mercantilism that we have fought against and the tyranny that we have stood against will be swallowed by the average American citizen. And they will call that ‘freedom’.”
via Arthur St. Clair on the U.S. Constitution — MichaelDuchemin.com.
When did the Reformation end?
One may see no vested priests or private masses being offered in chantry chapels, yet a lot in Evangelical worship today owes much to the un-Reformed habits of the late Middle Ages. I have been struck by this supreme historical irony as I visited many Evangelical churches in the past several years (the following comments are not aimed at any single congregation or denomination).
First, I encountered the extraordinary passivity of these congregations. Aside from usually standing to sing, the laity sit in silence for the entire service. They neither kneel nor stand to pray. Moreover, at the end of every prayer (offered by the minister alone), they are mute; most Protestant pastors must literally answer themselves with an audible “Amen.” Of course, levels of congregational participation vary among congregations, but the norm is amazingly passive. One would not be surprised to discover the laity bringing prayer beads like their medieval forerunners, just to have something to do during the service.
Second, as there is a paucity of participation, so there is often a scarcity of Scripture. While the biblical passage under consideration might be well expounded, the number of verses actually read is usually very small indeed. I have attended many services where a single verse was the extent of the lection for that Lord’s Day. Nor is there any compunction against reading exclusively from the New Testament. Sunday after Sunday may go by with no readings from the Old Testament during the main morning service. Is it possible that no one has ever heard of the Marcionite heresy? It does make me wonder.
Third, communion is administered infrequently, as in the late Middle Ages, so the faithful only receive a few times a year. And Evangelicals have found a new way to effectively deny the cup to the laity by avoiding the biblical element of wine. (Where is Jan Hus when we need him?) Against dominical command and the clear words of the New Testament, most Evangelicals persist in employing grape juice rather than wine in the sacrament. Paradoxically, those whose approach to Scripture might be deemed most literalistic choose to set aside Christ’s clear injunction.
Here, in a sense, is a modern Evangelical version of what the Anglican Thirty-nine Articles call a “work of supererogation.” Evangelicals may still reject the idea of accumulating surplus merit, but the implication of substituting grape juice for wine in the sacrament is that we know better than our Lord and can be more pious than Jesus. And some Evangelicals have an attitude toward alcohol that one could only describe as superstitious.
via Touchstone Archives: An Unlikely Window on the Medieval Church.
C. S. Lewis on Anxiety
Some people feel guilty about their anxieties and regard them as a defect of faith. I don’t agree at all. They are afflictions, not sins. Like all afflictions, they are, if we can so take them, our share in the Passion of Christ. For the beginning of the Passion–the first move, so to speak–is in Gethsemane. In Gethsemane a very strange and significant thing seems to have happened.
Read the rest at The Traveller: W: LP: GRP: CSL: Letters to Malcolm, comments.
Time to talk about it
When theological folks dichotomize, they often do it without regard to the reality of time. And this causes no end of trouble.
Given their assumptions about the political dualities of life, the anabaptist impulse to reject infant baptism is a shrewd one, because all these things are connected together. And infant baptism is a statement, among other things, about time. The tangles we get into over visible/invisible church, the City of God/city of man, kingdom of God/kingdom of the devil, heaven/earth all occur because we try to conceive of them all as static realities, and not as categories that exist in various forms of tension or battle over the course of history. Time matters; history matters. An infant you baptize is not the same person who goes to heaven, and yet is very much the same person. There is continuity/discontinuity, and much of it is revealed over time.
Read the rest at When Civilizations Are Baptized in Infancy.
This ends as a stellar response to some people who are 1) mistaken, in my opinion, and 2) acting as if their novel views are the standard of all orthodoxy and they have the right to treat those who disagree with them as unorthodox.
I loved that part.
But really, the words about the importance of time and our historic impulse to not talk about time is really much more profound than that single issue.
More on Leviticus 18.5
Following my quotation of Leviticus 18.1-5:
The legal principle of the covenant of works is sometimes expressed by the phrase: “Do this and live,” while the principle of gospel obedience is: “Live and do this.” Stating the difference this way is true enough but incomplete because this legal principle is also used evangelically to articulate the idea that progression in holiness is commensurate with experiencing life. Therefore, we do because we live and we do so that we may live.
Read the rest at Do and Live or Live and Do? « Patrick’s Pensees.
Note to self: next time I write on Romans 6 use this material
“What is Faith?” by Dr. Don B. Garlington
Introduction
Christianity is preeminently the religion of faith. We call it “The Christian Faith.” Paul can speak of ‘the faith’ in Galatians 3. He said that before ‘the faith’ came we were under tutors, those who were disciplining us to be able to recognize the Messiah when He actually came. Hebrews 11:6 says, “But without faith it is impossible to please Him, for he who comes to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of those who diligently seek Him.” We will focus our thoughts upon the Lord’s giving of Himself for us and His rising again.
Now faith, of course, plays a very large part in reformed theology. When I was in seminary they told us that faith consisted of three parts. Of course, going through a reformed seminary we had to know a little bit of Latin, so those three parts were ‘notitia, ascensus and fiducia.’ We were told that if we didn’t know those three words we couldn’t graduate, and so I made sure that I learned them! Notitia is knowledge. Knowledge of an object. Ascensus means that you assent to or consent to the reliability of that object of knowledge. And finally fiducia which means faith, reliance. So faith is knowledge, assent and trust, or reliance.
If you are doing a study of faith in terms of our systematic theology, that is fair enough, but as the Biblical materials present themselves, they actually present it to us from a somewhat different slant and point of view.
READ THE REST: What is Faith? Dr. Don B. Garlington.
You believed the Gospel and were justified
Do you not know that if you present yourselves to anyone as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin, which leads to death, or of obedience, which leads to righteousness? But thanks be to God, that you who were once slaves of sin have become obedient from the heart to the standard of teaching to which you were committed, and, having been set free from sin, have become slaves of righteousness.