Pretty amazing.  I’ve never been criticized for being quiet before.  But the issue isn’t “to speak” but “what to say?”  Deciding what to say has to do with actually listening to the debate as it unfolds.  I did think of an amendment to suggest, but that had to wait until Joe Novenson’s substitute was dealt with, and then I realized that debate was over before I got in line.  If it matters.  But, I’m not surprised Lane had to type something about Peter’s point.  It certainly is convicting.  And, no amount of Lane’s verbiage, or his commenters, can defuse the point.  And it makes the PCA look like…. well, look like what it is.