Category Archives: The Victory According to Mark

The Healing Pattern in the Gospel of Mark

What follows are some observations gleaned mostly from Austin Farrer’s Studies in Saint Mark, now out of print and not widely available. I expound on it a bit in my commentary on Mark (see sidebar).

Mark’s healing miracles always involve one person. He may save a group of disciples from a storm, but he only cures one person in an incident. Various healings are summarized, but specific incidents are mentioned with one and only one recipient (unlike Matthews two blind men or Luke’s dozen lepers).

There seem to be three kinds of healings, two that rid a person of something bad and one that gives something good. The first two are exorcisms (ridding a person of demons) and cleansings (ridding a person of uncleanness). Both of these are linked because demons are called “unclean” spirits. Then there are restorations, in which a person is “raised up” (Greek: egeiro). There are fourteen such healings in Mark’s Gospel.

1.1-3.6: Exorcism, Restoration, Cleansing, Restoration / Restoration

Notice that the second Restoration involves making a man walk, and the third gives him back the use of his hand. They are natural complements. Also, the third restoration is the climax of a “mini-cycle” which imitates what starts in 1.14: the calling of persons from their normal occupation by the sea (2.14). We have here four incidents with the last one complemented: feet & hands. In this block, a son requests healing for a mother-in-law.

3.7-6.6: Exorcism, Re-{Cleansing}-storation

There are three healings told as two events (because the raising of Jairus’ daughter is sandwiched around the woman with the issue of blood. Here there is not complement. There’s can’t be one because a resurrection is quite impossible to improve upon. Indeed, from now on the restorations will not involve bodies and limbs, but rather problems in the head. Mark is moving toward his climax and, having recorded a resurrection, keeps building by moving from body to head. In this block, a father requests healing for a daughter.

6.7-8.38: Exorcism, Restoration / Restoration

In this case there are two healings with a complement given to the latter. A deaf mute is given hearing and speech, and then a blind villager is given back his sight: ears, mouth & eyes. In this block, a mother requests healing for a daughter.

9:1-12.52: Exorcisive Restoration / Restoration

Again a deaf mute is healed followed by a blind man. In this case, however, the deaf mute’s problem is demon possession, so the restoration is conflated with an exorcism. In this block, a father requests healing for a son. Notice then how the focus sharpens in these last two cycles:

  • Third cycle: Exorcism of a child at parent’s prayer, and healing of a deaf mute; Healing of a blind man (7.24-30, 31-37; 8.22-26).
  • Fourth cycle: Exorcism of a deaf and dumb child at parent’s prayer; Healing of a blind man (9.14-29; 10.46-52).

Thus the climax and fourteenth healing is

The Resurrection of Jesus.

All healing is summed up in Jesus. He is cleansed from death and filled with the Spirit; able to walk and grasp with Spirit-given feet and hands, able to hear God’s word, see God’s creation, and praise God’s name. The Father raises the Son.

copyright © 2000

If I ever get to re-issue my Mark commentary, this goes in

Upon hearing Jesus’ “confession,” the high priest tears his clothes. Not only is it forbidden in the law for the high priests to tear their clothes (Lev. 10:6, 21:10), but it is required that lepers go about with torn clothes. As the high priest cries out “blasphemy!” he inadvertently dons the uniform of a leper who was to tear his clothes and cry out “unclean!” (Lev. 13:45)

All this on the heels of Jesus’ inspection of the temple for leprosy (compare Mk. 11:11-13:2 with Lev. 14:33-45). And meanwhile Jesus is lodging at the house of Simon the leper (Mk. 14:3), who has presumably been cleansed. The high priest and the old Jewish temple is powerless to cleanse and even worse it is infected with uncleanness and spreads uncleanness. But Jesus is the true temple and whoever He touches is cleansed. Jesus is the true high priest who offers the healing of God.

via Having Two Legs: The High Priest Leper.

Another resurrection (and commission) in Mark’s Gospel

John Barah posts a fantastic observation on the resurrection theme which Mark laces throughout his Gospel. John shows that when Jesus rose up early in the morning on the first day of the week and his disciples had to hunt for him, that the event is described in ways that foreshadow the resurrection scene in Matthew 16. Jesus wants his disciples to leave and go out elsewhere.

It is an great point and is certainly backed up by the way Mark writes about other events. I argue, for example (following Austin Farrar, of course!) that Herod’s murder of John the baptizer is done in a way that is heavily reminiscent to what happens to Jesus at the hands of Pilate in Jerusalem. And this is all presented as the background for a “Great Commission” in Mark 6.7-13, following immediately on a story about how Jesus was rejected by his own countrymen (Mark 6.1-6).

The relationship is even more comprehensive because that we are explicitly told that when Herod hears the stories of the powers at work in Jesus’ disciples, he believes it is because murdered John is alive again. So even though Mark contains no explicit story of Pentecost, we see that the idea is quite evident in his Gospel that the Righteous One gets forcefully sentenced, as a favor on a feast day, and is killed and rises again to send out followers in the power of the Spirit….